RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00358
INDEX CODE: 128.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS:
Removal of the debt balance for Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
(SGLI) coverage for the months of April 2001 - February 2002.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
Supporting documents were not submitted. The applicant’s complete
submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied. DPS stated that
Headquarters, Air Reserve Personnel Center (HQ ARPC) advertised the
change to the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) program
extensively. The applicant did not cancel his coverage until 29 Jan
02 and was charged for coverage from Apr 01 - Jan 02. The HQ ARPC/DPS
evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 5
April 2002 for review and response. As of this date, no response has
been received by this office (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. His contentions are duly noted;
however, we do not find these uncorroborated assertions, in and by
themselves sufficiently persuasive to override the rationale provided
by the Air Force office of primary responsibility. We therefore agree
with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and conclude that the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden that he has suffered either an error or injustice. In the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered in Executive Session on
24 July 2002, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jan 02.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPS, dated 22 Mar 02.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Apr 02.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. The provision also stated that within the month of April 2001, any PIRR member could elect to withdraw or reduce their coverage without being charged $20 per month for the maximum coverage of $250,000. We took...
In view of the reasons listed, he contends that the SGLI was improperly started and that the associated bill should be removed from his record. Exhibit D. Letter from Applicant, dated 25 Nov 01. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-02519 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03609
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member decline coverage. DPS states...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00107 INDEX CODE 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) election for “NO” coverage, dated 10 February 1999, be honored and he be reimbursed for the monthly premiums deducted from his pay for SGLI coverage of $250,000 since 1 April 2001. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03610
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was attending basic military training at the time declination of FSGLI needed to be accomplished and had no way of knowing about the new insurance coverage or the accruing debt. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. DPS states that the applicant completed the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) election statement declining coverage on 4 Sep 02, which became effective 1 Oct 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03779
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member decline coverage. As of this...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03036
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03036 INDEX NUMBER: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit B). They indicated that HQ, Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) advertised the change to the program extensively. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02897
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied, and states in part, that there is no evidence that an injustice occurred. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-02897...