RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00608
INDEX CODE: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reimbursed for the amount of Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance (SGLI) deducted from her pay beginning in April 2001.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit B).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPS recommended denial. They indicated that HQ, Air Reserve
Personnel Center (ARPC) advertised the change to the program
extensively. An article was included in the January/February 2001
issue of the Air Reserve Personnel Update and again in the May/June
2001 issue. These updates were mailed to the member at his home
address, according to correspondence received from personnel at HQ
ARPC Public Affairs Office. The ARPC website had information about
the change, along with instructions on what to do if he wanted
decreased coverage or wished to decline coverage. An update about the
change to the program was printed on the February 2001 Leave and
Earning Statement (LES). In addition, information was posted on the
“Above & Beyond” ARPC website.
The applicant states he did not ask for the SGLI Insurance, nor did he
know that the increase pertained to him. In fact, the coverage was
automatic and was extensively advertised. He did not decline coverage
until 2 October 2001, so, he was charged for coverage from April
through October 2001. If the decision is to grant the relief sought
the member’s record should be corrected to show that he elected to
withdraw coverage under SGLI, effective April 2001.
The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 10 May 2002, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an error or an injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
00608 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
Mr. Jackson A. Hauslein, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 February 2002, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPS, dated 29 April 2002, w/atchs.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 2002.
JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
Panel Chair
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. The provision also stated that within the month of April 2001, any PIRR member could elect to withdraw or reduce their coverage without being charged $20 per month for the maximum coverage of $250,000. We took...
The coverage, by law, is automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who have a spouse and/or children, unless the member declines coverage. In addition to the letters, articles were published in the September/October and November/December 2001 Air Reserve Personnel Update explaining the change to the program. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-00894 in Executive Session on 24 July 2002...
The provision also stated that within the month of April 2001, any PIRR member could elect to withdraw or reduce their coverage without being charged $20 per month for the maximum coverage of $250,000. The applicant further states that she did not receive the ARPC update and that the website “does not say that the older forms are not valid anymore or that I have to resubmit a form even though I already had one on file.” Additionally, the website contains a section specifically addressing...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04021
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was never informed, nor did he enroll in the FSGLI program. HQ Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) Entitlements sent a letter on the expanded SGLI coverage to all Reservists clearly explaining the program and extensively advertised the changes to the program. They conclude there has been no evidence of any injustice towards the member.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02798
There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records indicating she declined SGLI coverage during April 2001. She failed to decline SGLI coverage prior to her effective retirement date of 1 November 2002. The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 16 January 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01911
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS recommended denial. She served two weeks as an IMA reservist in August of 2002 and received monthly LES statements from September 2002 on, even though she was obligated to one two-week tour a year. The applicant indicates that she was on active duty in April 2001 when the law was changed; however, she presents no documentation to indicate she declined coverage at that time.
In view of the reasons listed, he contends that the SGLI was improperly started and that the associated bill should be removed from his record. Exhibit D. Letter from Applicant, dated 25 Nov 01. JOSEPH G. DIAMOND Panel Chair AFBCMR 01-02519 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00830
The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage. His MPF could not find a copy of his letter declining coverage. HQ ARPC extensively advertised the change to the program, including an article in the Air Reserve Personnel Update, and the notifications sent to the applicant’s address contained information regarding the FSGLI changes.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03642
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She submitted an SGFLV 8386A declining spouse coverage. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS states that all members of the Participating Individual Ready Reserve were notified concerning the new law and declination procedures in August and October 2001. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01797
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: No FSGLI was collected from her pay until 15 May 2003 when 19 months ($380.00) of “debt” was suddenly taken. All members of the Participating Individual Ready Reserve (PIRR) were mailed a letter with information concerning the new law and declination procedures, in August and October 2001 (Atch 1). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...