RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00327
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable
conditions).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or
unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the
letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of
Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLSA/JAJM reviewed this application and recommended denial.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 20
Jun 02 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been
received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After careful consideration of
applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find
insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective
action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear
to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by
applicant. Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to
which entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb
the existing record.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 30 Jul 02, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Edward C. Koenig III, Panel Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 28 Jan 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFLSA/JAJM, dated 18 Jun 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 20 Jun 02.
EDWARD C. KOENIG III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02605
JAJM stated that on 13 Jun 96, the Air Force Court of Military Review (AFCMR) affirmed the court-martial findings and sentence of a bad conduct discharge. The applicant has already received an upgrade to her characterization of service. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00070
The complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 30 Aug 02 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01447 INDEX CODE: 110.00 . _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: After serving 4 years and 1 month in the United States Navy, he contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 22 Feb 82. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
DPPRS further states that the applicant has not submitted any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that may have occurred during his discharge processing. The applicant has not provided any supporting documentation to warrant upgrading his discharge. DPPRS recommends denying the applicant's request.
The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant's request to have his general discharge upgraded to honorable on 8 January 1997 (Exhibit B). DPPRS further states that the applicant has not submitted any new evidence or identified any errors or injustices that may have occurred during his discharge processing. The applicant has not provided any supporting documentation to warrant upgrading his discharge.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01315 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of reenlistment be changed from 11 December 2001 to 29 January 2002 to qualify for a higher Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The applicant reenlisted on 11 December 2001 before the SRB review had been announced...
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the applicant's military records (Exhibit B) and in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force (Exhibit C). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. Further, he has provided no evidence that he has rehabilitated himself or become a productive member of society since his discharge.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01294 INDEX CODE 126.04 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15 action and the punishment imposed on 7 Jun 01, be set aside. Applicant's profile for the last 6 reporting periods follows: Period Ending Evaluation 26 Jun 96 5 - Immediate Promotion 26 Jun 97 5 28 Jun 98 5 28 Jun 99 5 28...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR notes the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 2 Bronze Service Stars. They advise that the AFEM was only awarded for service in Vietnam during the period 1 Jul 58-3 Jul 65. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Exhibit B.