RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03003
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He would like his RE code changed to enlist in the Air Force Reserves.
In support of his request, he submits six character reference letters and
other documentation.
Applicant's complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 17 February 1981 in the
grade of airman basic for a period of 4 years.
He was a first-term airman who was considered and denied reenlistment under
the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) and denied promotion to E-4.
On 18 June 1984, the applicant’s commander signed an AF Form 418, Selective
Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status Consideration, denying
promotion and reenlistment.
The applicant received an RE code of “2X” (First-term airman considered but
not selected under SRP, or has been denied appointment to NCO status, or
has had NCO status vacated).
A resume of the applicant's performance reports since 1983 follows:
PERIOD ENDING OVERALL EVALUATION
23 Feb 83 Letter of Evaluation (LOE)
6 Nov 83 5
30 Mar 84 7
11 Feb 85 8
Applicant was honorably discharged on 16 February 1985, in the grade of
A1C, in accordance with AFR 39-10 (Expiration Term Of Service). He served
a total of 4 years.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of investigation,
Washington, D.C., indicated on the basis of the data furnished they were
unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Skills Management Branch, Directorate, Personnel Program
Management, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, reviewed this application and states that they
recommend applicant’s request be denied. The commander’s action to deny
reenlistment and promotion was justified. The commander states his
decision was based on the applicant’s “immaturity and slow progression of
training…coded ineligible to reenter the active or reserve armed forces…”
and that his decision was “…prudent, in no-way in error; and in the best
interest of the Air Force…” The applicant has not satisfactorily indicated
the commander’s action to deny reenlistment was inappropriate or not in
compliance with Air Force policy. However, if the decision is to grant the
relief sought, applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect an RE code
of 3K, “Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction
of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code
applies or is appropriate.”
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 19 January 2001 a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within thirty (30) days (Exhibit E). As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
In response to the Board’s request for post-service documentation, the
applicant has submitted additional documentation which is attached at
Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
therefore, the Board agrees with the opinion and recommendation of the Air
Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The RE code
issued at the time of separation was in accordance with the applicable
regulations. The RE code “2X” is used for “First-term, second-term, or
career airmen considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP).” A review of the applicant’s overall
duty performance while on active duty would appear to substantiate the
reason he was not selected for reenlistment. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, the Board finds no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 April 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Peggy E. Gordon, Panel Chair
Mr. Philip Sheuerman, Member
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Nov 00, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 8 Jan 01.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 19 Jan 01.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 8 Mar 01, w/atchs.
PEGGY E. GORDON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02091
On 24 Jun 04, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Completion of Required Active Service), and furnished an RE code of 2X (First-term, second term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)). ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied and states, in part, after a review of his military...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-02411 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed. Should the Board decide to grant relief to the applicant, his RE code should be changed to 3K (Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-01074
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 15 Jun 98 for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the RE code issued at the time of his discharge was either in error or unjust. While the AF Form 418, denying...
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 15 Jun 98 for review and response. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the RE code issued at the time of his discharge was either in error or unjust. While the AF Form 418, denying...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01955
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01955 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2X be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01528 INDEX CODE: 100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of “2C” on the DD Form 214, “Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty,” be changed to “1J” to allow enlistment into the Hawaii Air National Guard. We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01560
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01560 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X be removed from Item 27, Reenlistment Code, of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued on 10 August 1985. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02857
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02857 INDEX CODE: 110.00 APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment code (RE) be changed to allow her to join the Air Force Reserve. The applicant’s commander notified her on 6 July 1989, that he was not recommending her for promotion because she received an Article...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01569
Applicant believes with all of the support documentation in his case, he is a very valuable asset to the Air Force In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; extracts from his military personnel record, including copies of his performance reports and AF IMT 418s, along with several letters of character reference. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Applicant’s commander concurred and denied his reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00345
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAE, dated 1 Mar 05. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR dated 18 Mar 05. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2005-00345 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...