Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2000 | 9901259
Original file (9901259.doc) Auto-classification: Denied


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  99-01259
            INDEX CODE:  128.00

            COUNSEL:  DONALD L. DALTON

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Order  for  recoupment  of  all  funds  expended  on  Armed  Forces   Health
Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP) be rescinded.

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Counsel states that the applicant planned on entering active  duty  in  July
1997 as a family practice physician.   He  planned  on  serving  his  entire
active duty service commitment (ADSC) to repay his financial  obligation  to
the United States.  He never sought to avoid active duty.  He was  prevented
from entering active duty by action of the Air Force.

He had a routine medical exam on 5 December 1996 and  reported  low  to  mid
back pain with surgical laminectomy L4-5  level  and  what  appeared  to  be
carpal tunnel syndrome.  In honestly reporting  his  medical  condition,  he
was not trying to get out of active duty.

Applicant was informed of the Disability Evaluation System (DES), and  opted
against entering the system.  He did not  believe  that  he  would  ever  be
found fit and saw no point in challenging the Surgeon General’s  evaluation.
 He requested a waiver of the repayment of indebtedness and  explained  that
he did not disagree with  the  SG’s  evaluation,  but  did  not  believe  it
prevented him from serving his  active  duty  obligation.   He  acknowledged
that his medical condition prevented worldwide  availability,  but  insisted
that there were other places to serve.  He made it clear  that  if  the  Air
Force would not waive some or the entire financial obligation, he wished  to
be permitted to serve his active duty commitment.

Applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant  was  an  Armed  Forces  Health  Professions  Scholarship  Program
(AFHPSP) student from 20 August 1990 through 30 May 1994.

On 22 May 1992,  applicant  was  appointed  captain,  Medical  Service  Corp
(MSC).

In 20 May  1994,  applicant  graduated  from  George  Washington  University
School of Medicine.

On 5 December 1996, applicant reported low to mid back  pain  with  surgical
laminectomy La4-5 level, and  possible  carpal  tunnel  syndrome  during   a
medical exam.

On 4 April 1997, he was found medically  disqualified  for  extended  active
duty.

On 31 December 1997, he was notified of  the  Disability  Evaluation  System
(DES),  that  he  was  determined  disqualified  due  to   progressive   and
symptomatic degenerative disc disease and bilateral carpal tunnel  syndrome,
and he had been recommended for discharge.

On 20 January 1998, he submitted  his  election  of  options,  and  did  not
choose to be entered  into  the  DES;  and  chose  to  submit  a  Tender  of
Resignation (TOR) and a letter requesting a waiver of the repayment  of  his
indebtedness.

On 1 May 1998, the Air Force Personnel Council  directed  the  applicant  be
honorably discharged and determined he was required to reimburse the  United
States Government for the funds expended  on  his  education.   Indebtedness
incurred by applicant totaled $107,766.36.

He was discharged on 8 May  1998,  under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-3209,
paragraph 2.46.3, Separation Procedures  for  Air  National  Guard  and  Air
Force Reserve Members, and he received an honorable discharge.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Director of Personnel Program Management,  HQ  ARPC/DPP,  reviewed  this
application and states that the AFBCMR does not have the authority to  waive
recoupment.  The SAF is the final authority on waiving indebtedness  of  the
United States Government.  The Board, however, can make a  determination  on
whether an error or  injustice  has  occurred.   By  applicant  signing  the
contract, he understood the terms of the  contract  and  the  commitment  he
entered with the United States Government regarding the  recoupment  issues.
Therefore,  an  error  or  injustice  has  not  occurred.   Therefore,  they
recommend denial of applicant’s request.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with  attachment,  is  attached
at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 17 September 1999, a copy of the Air Force evaluation  was  forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within thirty days.  As of this  date,
no response has been received by this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice.  After reviewing the  evidence  of
record, we are not persuaded that the  applicant  has  been  the  victim  of
either an error or injustice.   It  appears  that  the  applicant  chose  to
submit his resignation rather than  being  evaluated  under  the  Disability
Evaluation  System  (DES).   Based  on  this  decision,   he   incurred   an
indebtedness for funds expended  on  his  Armed  Forces  Health  Professions
Scholarship Program (AFHPSP) education.   The  evidence  before  this  Board
does not reveal that the applicant was miscounseled at the time he made  his
decision to resign.   Therefore, we find no basis upon  which  to  recommend
favorable action on this application.

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 2 February 2000, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                  Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
                  Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
                  Mr. Lawrence R. Leehy, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Mar 99, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 27 Aug 99, w/atchs.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 17 Sep 99.





                                THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04303

    Original file (BC-2003-04303.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The initial action, taken by the Air Force, in disqualifying her from the scholarship program required her to drop out of medical school and resign her commission. On 19 November 1999, the applicant’s 30 August 1999 resignation was accepted by the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC). It was only after she informed the Air Force of her decision to drop out of medical school that she was told she could not be discharged for depression and that the information and guidance...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01077

    Original file (BC-2005-01077.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    After finishing the lengthy process of withdrawing from HPSP in order to go active, he was informed that he was not qualified for the BSC and was presented a bill for HPSP recoupment. On 24 November 2004, the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council ordered the applicant be honorably discharged and to reimburse the United States Government for the funds expended on his education through the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship and Financial Assistance Program. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800785

    Original file (9800785.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this case, the Secretary of the Air Force determined that applicant made his homosexual statements for the purpose of seeking separation, and that determination is the basis for recoupment. Therefore, based on the totality of the evidence before this Board, we recommend his records be corrected to the extent indicated below. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002931

    Original file (0002931.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02931 INDEX CODE: 128.10 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted relief from having to reimburse the government for the cost of his education incurred under the Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP). The account was transferred from the Air Force to DFAS on 3 Mar...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003177

    Original file (0003177.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    While there is no disputing the fact that the applicant did accrue a debt to the government for his education, the Board majority noted that his wife suffers from recurrent major clinical depression, he has two children, over $100,000 in debts, and he has been supporting his family on a reduced income. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02932

    Original file (BC-2012-02932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Armed Forces Health Professions Scholarship Program (AFHPSP) contract the applicant signed specifically states that if a member is separated prior to completing a period of active duty that was agreed upon to serve, the member may be subject to recoupment of educational funds. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0002963

    Original file (0002963.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 29 Dec 00 for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority deferred until 1 January 2003, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00904

    Original file (BC-2008-00904.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The SAF/MRB (Legal Advisor) notes the DoD guidance, dated 18 Sep 07, clearly states “that where the inability to serve was due to medical conditions beyond the member’s control recoupment would not be sought.” Applicant’s case was considered in Jan 07 under the stricter guidance dated 8 Apr 05, but counsel argues that the Board should follow the Sep 07 guidance and find the Jan 07 decision...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00295

    Original file (BC-2001-00295.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s rebuttal, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, General Law Division, HQ USAF/JAG, noted that Section 2005 provides for recoupment if a member fails to complete the ADSC voluntarily or due to misconduct. On 14 Aug 01, DFAS-POCC/DE advised the applicant that, based on her placement on the TDRL, it was inappropriate at this time to recoup monies which might not be owed if...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03145

    Original file (BC-2002-03145.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 Jan 00, HQ ARPC/SGP advised the applicant that review of her physical exam was completed and entries identified a history of migraine headaches that could be disqualifying for military service. The applicant was selected for entry into active duty for an evaluation of this diagnosis to determine if a medically disqualifying condition existed. The transmittal letter also asked the applicant to provide the Board with a copy of her signed HPSP contract.