Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00873
Original file (BC-1998-00873.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  98-00873

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO


_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.    His transfer to the  Retired  Reserves  be  corrected  or  changed  to
entitle him to full, or at least partial, benefits.

2.    He be credited  with  sufficient  number  of  satisfactory  retirement
years to qualify for retirement.

3.    His four years  in  the  Reserve  Officer  Training  Corps  (ROTC)  be
considered as satisfactory retirement years.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust  and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The relevant facts  pertaining  to  this  application,  extracted  from  the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter  prepared  by  the
appropriate office of the Air Force.   Accordingly,  there  is  no  need  to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Directorate of Personnel  Program  Management,  ARPC/DP,  reviewed  this
application and states that the applicant  did  not  complete  20  years  of
satisfactory service and is not eligible for  Reserve  retired  pay  or  any
benefits associated with such pay.  Therefore, they recommend denial of  his
requests.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the Air Force  evaluation  and  provided  a  response
which is attached at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to  demonstrate  the
existence  of  probable  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice   of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;  however,
we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air  Force  and  adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant  has  not
been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the  absence  of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend  granting
the relief sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the  application
was denied without a personal appearance;  and  that  the  application  will
only be reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of  newly  discovered  relevant
evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 10 February 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                  Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
                  Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Member
                  Mr. Walter J. Hosey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 29 Jun 98, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DP, dated 15 Sep 98, w/atchs.
      Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 Oct 98.
      Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Nov 98, w/atchs.




            RICHARD A. PETERSON
            Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800873

    Original file (9800873.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DP, reviewed this application and states that the applicant did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900690

    Original file (9900690.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Subsequent to this time, the applicant has earned sufficient points to be credited with a satisfactory year of Federal service for the R/R year 30 Apr 98 to 29 Apr 99. DP indicated that in accordance with the governing Air Force manual, a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement is awarded when a member earns a minimum of 50 points in their full R/R year. After a careful review of the evidence of record, we note that, except for the retirement/retention period in question, the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802846

    Original file (9802846.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, states that applicant’s point history was corrected 31 January 1984; however, he had already been a nonselect for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel for the second time. According to the point credit branch records, applicant had a history of submitting points two or three years after the fact. It is the member’s responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801901

    Original file (9801901.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 July 1996, HQ ARPC/SGS recommended the applicant be administratively discharged for medical disqualification, i.e., neurological condition with residual speech disturbance, and that he was not eligible for disability processing under the provisions of AFI 36-3212, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement and AFMPC/DPMA Separations. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director, Health Services, HQ ARPC/SG, advises that major...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802277

    Original file (9802277.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02277 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to the Reserve grade of Colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Fiscal Year 1998 (FY98) Reserve of the Air Force Colonel Selection Board. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9802772

    Original file (9802772.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit B. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-02772 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | 0200932

    Original file (0200932.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this regard, the applicant apparently believed that certain inactive periods with the USPHS were creditable towards satisfactory service and, as a medical officer, he would be retained until age 68. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00932 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01034A

    Original file (BC-1997-01034A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since there was no provision of law that permits receipt of retired pay unless this requirement has been met, the Board agreed with the Air Force evaluation and found no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant, with counsel, has submitted an application, dated 16 June 1998, requesting reconsideration of his earlier request to grant an additional two years of Reserve service to be eligible to receive Reserve...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9701034

    Original file (9701034.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since there was no provision of law that permits receipt of retired pay unless this requirement has been met, the Board agreed with the Air Force evaluation and found no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant, with counsel, has submitted an application, dated , requesting reconsideration of his earlier request to grant an additional two years of Reserve service to be eligible to receive Reserve retired pay at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9701034A

    Original file (9701034A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since there was no provision of law that permits receipt of retired pay unless this requirement has been met, the Board agreed with the Air Force evaluation and found no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant, with counsel, has submitted an application, dated 16 June 1998, requesting reconsideration of his earlier request to grant an additional two years of Reserve service to be eligible to receive Reserve...