RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00873
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His transfer to the Retired Reserves be corrected or changed to
entitle him to full, or at least partial, benefits.
2. He be credited with sufficient number of satisfactory retirement
years to qualify for retirement.
3. His four years in the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) be
considered as satisfactory retirement years.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust and
the evidence submitted in support of the appeal are at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the
applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the
appropriate office of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to
recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DP, reviewed this
application and states that the applicant did not complete 20 years of
satisfactory service and is not eligible for Reserve retired pay or any
benefits associated with such pay. Therefore, they recommend denial of his
requests.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and provided a response
which is attached at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 10 February 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Vaughn E. Schlunz, Member
Mr. Walter J. Hosey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jun 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DP, dated 15 Sep 98, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 5 Oct 98.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Nov 98, w/atchs.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00873
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Directorate of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DP, reviewed this application and states that the applicant did not complete 20 years of satisfactory service...
Subsequent to this time, the applicant has earned sufficient points to be credited with a satisfactory year of Federal service for the R/R year 30 Apr 98 to 29 Apr 99. DP indicated that in accordance with the governing Air Force manual, a year of satisfactory Federal service for retirement is awarded when a member earns a minimum of 50 points in their full R/R year. After a careful review of the evidence of record, we note that, except for the retirement/retention period in question, the...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DP, states that applicant’s point history was corrected 31 January 1984; however, he had already been a nonselect for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel for the second time. According to the point credit branch records, applicant had a history of submitting points two or three years after the fact. It is the member’s responsibility...
On 31 July 1996, HQ ARPC/SGS recommended the applicant be administratively discharged for medical disqualification, i.e., neurological condition with residual speech disturbance, and that he was not eligible for disability processing under the provisions of AFI 36-3212, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement and AFMPC/DPMA Separations. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director, Health Services, HQ ARPC/SG, advises that major...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02277 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to the Reserve grade of Colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the Fiscal Year 1998 (FY98) Reserve of the Air Force Colonel Selection Board. ...
Accordingly, we recommend that the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit B. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 98-02772 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to , be corrected to...
In this regard, the applicant apparently believed that certain inactive periods with the USPHS were creditable towards satisfactory service and, as a medical officer, he would be retained until age 68. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that: a. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR 02-00932 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-01034A
Since there was no provision of law that permits receipt of retired pay unless this requirement has been met, the Board agreed with the Air Force evaluation and found no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant, with counsel, has submitted an application, dated 16 June 1998, requesting reconsideration of his earlier request to grant an additional two years of Reserve service to be eligible to receive Reserve...
Since there was no provision of law that permits receipt of retired pay unless this requirement has been met, the Board agreed with the Air Force evaluation and found no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant, with counsel, has submitted an application, dated , requesting reconsideration of his earlier request to grant an additional two years of Reserve service to be eligible to receive Reserve retired pay at...
Since there was no provision of law that permits receipt of retired pay unless this requirement has been met, the Board agreed with the Air Force evaluation and found no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit F. Applicant, with counsel, has submitted an application, dated 16 June 1998, requesting reconsideration of his earlier request to grant an additional two years of Reserve service to be eligible to receive Reserve...