A I R FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NO: 97-03809JfjN 2 2
COUNSEL: NONE
1998
HEARING DESIRt3: NO
2-
Applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be
changed. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
.Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board, Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Mr. Michael P.
Higgins, and Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz considered this application
on 17 June 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 , and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
, ,
+AVID c. $AN GASBECK
/' ,
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R F O R C E
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL C E N T E R
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPAE
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712
1 2 FEB a98
The applicant requests his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to a favorable
code to qualify him for entry into the Navy. He has filed a timely request.
The applicant was discharged 6 May 97 with an honorable characterization of service
after serving four years, four months, and eight days active and inactive service. He received an
RE code of “2X: First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for
reenlistment under the SRP.”
A review of applicant’s military persome1 records revealed an AF Form 418, Selective
Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 24 May 96, denying him reenlistment. Applicant
signed the form the Same day, indicating his acknowledgment of nonselection and his intent not
to appeal the denial.
Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE
code. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be
corrected to reflect his RE code as “3K: Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board
for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code
applies or is appropriate.”
Chief, Skills Mana@bnt Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Management
9703809
On 28 Apr 98, the applicant provided additional evidence and requested that the Board reconsider her application (Exhibit F) . The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The discharge complies with directives in effect at the time of her discharge.
Exhibit A. code be Applicant's RE code of 2B is defined as "Separated with Applicant's submission is at The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00114 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES AU9 r-1 898 Applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be deleted. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Unfortunately, the AF Form 41 8 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect his RE code as “3K: Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. code be The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE code.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01185 SEP 2 9 1998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES Applicant requests that (1) her Calendar Year 1998 (CY981 Lieutenant Colonel, Nurse Corp, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) be replaced with a new PRF and (2) she be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY98 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board. The appropriate Air...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00016 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Y Applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
% The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D) . At the time of her reenlistment, she had no reason to believe her AFSC would get an SRB or to delay her reenlistment until 1998.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the application and stated that OPRs on active duty officers are due for file at HQ AFPC no later than 60 days after closeout date. t RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence 'of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. Air Force Review Boards Agency DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE P E R S O N N...
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 2 I IN THE MATTER OF: I DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03354 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) be updated to reflect his completion of small arms training. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief , Education and Training Branch, Directorate of Personnel Programs reviewed this application and states that the applicant did not provide a copy...