AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02208 m COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of
2X be changed. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. Benedict A. Kausal IV, Mr. Patrick R.
Wheeler, and Mrs. Margaret A. Zook considered this application on
5 Jan 99 in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
'BENEDICT A. KAUSAL IV
Panel Chair
Exhibits :
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
--
i
f
DEPARTMENT OF T H E A I R FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
MEMORANDUMFOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPC/DPPAE
550 C Street West Ste 10
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712
1 7 SEP 1998
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of qecor
’t
The applicant requests his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to a favorable
code. He has filed a timely request.
The applicant was discharged 3 1 Oct 95 with an honorable characterization of service
after serving three years, ten months, and 20 days of active service. He received an RE code of
“2X: First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment
under the SRP.”
A review of applicant’s military personnel records revealed an AF Form 4 18, Selective
Reenlisfment Program Consickration, dated 22 Sep 94, denying him reenlistment. Applicant
signed the form on 22 Sep 94, indicating his acknowledgment of nonselection and his intent to
appeal the decision. However, there is no evidence that he submitted an appeal within the
required timeframe.
Considering the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of
RE code. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be
corrected to reflect his RE code as “3K: Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board
for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code
applies or is appropriate.”
Chief, Skills Manafient Branch
Dir of Personnel Program Management
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant. The applicant alleges miscounseling by the Military Personnel Flight (MPF) regarding the option to reenlist.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The commander advised applicant that if his recommendation is approved, that his discharge would be described as entry level separation and that he would be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force. The records indicate member’s military service was reviewed and appropriate action was taken.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03304 INDEX CODE 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect receipt of the following awards: 1. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 was up to date when he separated on 22 December 1997. His request for...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant’s request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Contrary to what the applicant states in her request, the "2Q" code was not assigned simply to prevent her immediate reenlistment, but rather to reflect the fact that she was separated with an unfitting medical condition under provisions of AFR 35-4 and the disability evaluation sys- tem. Page 2 AFBCMR Case #...
Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A. code be The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE code.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C) . Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the application was filed. The applicant is requesting his uncharacterized character of service be changed to honorable.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Unfortunately, the AF Form 41 8 denying applicant reenlistment is not on file in his military personnel record. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect his RE code as “3K: Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02960
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97-02960 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY94A (22 Aug 94) Major Board (P0494A), with a corrected officer selection record (OSR). As to the MSM, he feels the MSM should...