Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9800114
Original file (9800114.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

DOCKET NO: 98-00114 
COUNSEL:  NONE 

HEARING DESIRED:  YES 

AU9  r-1 898 

Applicant requests that his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be 
deleted.  Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A .  
The appropriate  Air Force office evaluated applicant's request 
and provided  an advisory opinion to  the Board  recommending the 
application  be  denied  (Exhibit C).  The  advisory  opinion  was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response  (Exhibit D). 
Applicant has provided a response (Exhibit E). 

After  careful  consideration  of  applicant's  request  and  the 
available evidence of  record, we  find  insufficient evidence  of 
error or injustice to warrant corrective action.  The facts and 
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the 
evidence  of  record  and  have  not  been  adequately  rebutted  by 
applicant. 
Absent  persuasive  evidence  applicant  was  denied 
rights  to  which  entitled,  appropriate  regulations  were  not 
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we  find no 
basis to disturb the existing record. 

Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. 

The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been 
shown that  a personal  appearance with  or  without  counsel  will 
materially  add  to  our  understanding of  the  issue(s)  involved. 
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. 

The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision. 
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and 
will only be  reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant 
evidence  which  was  not  reasonably  available  at  the  time  the 
application was filed. 

- 

Members  of  the  Board  Mr.  Thomas S. Markiewicz, Mr.  Henry Romo 
Jr., and  Mr.  Walter  J.  Hosey, considered  this  application  on 
19 August  1998,  in accordance with  the provisions of  Air  Force 
Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10, U.S.C. 1552. 

THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ 
Panel Chair 

Exhibits: 

A.  Applicant's DD Form 149 
B.  Available Master Personnel Records 
C.  Advisory Opinion 
D.  AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion 
E.  Applicant's Response 

. 

DEPARTMENT O F  THE A I R   FORCE 

HEADQUARTERS AIR  FORCE PERSONNEL CENTER 

RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS 

MEMORANDUM FOR  AFBCMR 

FROM:  HQ AFPCDPPAE 

550 C Street West Ste 10 
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4712 

0 3  MAR a98 

The applicant requests to have his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code deleted.  He has 

filed a timely request. 

The applicant was discharged 7 Apr 97 with an honorable characterization of service 
after serving 14 years, six months, and 17 days of active service.  He received an RE code of 
“2X:  First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment 
under the SRP.” 

A review of applicant’s military personnel records and the documents provided revealed 

an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program Consideration, dated 3 Sep 96, denying him 
. reenlistment. Applicant signed the form on 5 Sep 96, indicating his acknowledgment of 
nonselection and his intent not to appeal the denial. 

Considering the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of 
RE code.  However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, applicant’s record should be 
corrected to reflect his RE code as “3K:  Reserved for use by HQ AFPC or the Air Force Board 
for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) when no other reenlistment eligibility code 
applies or is appropriate.” 

Chief, Skills Man&mek  Branch ‘ 
Dir of Personnel Program Management 

98001 14 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703809

    Original file (9703809.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE code.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00245

    Original file (BC-2008-00245.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00245 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted supplemental promotion consideration for the 2008 Senior Master Sergeant (E-8) cycle, and subsequent promotion cycles, with an enlisted performance report (EPR) selection record that includes ten years of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703489

    Original file (9703489.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Appeals and SSB Branch, AFPC/DPPPA, reviewed the application and stated that OPRs on active duty officers are due for file at HQ AFPC no later than 60 days after closeout date. t RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence 'of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. Air Force Review Boards Agency DEPARTMENT OF THE A I R FORCE HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE P E R S O N N...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703355

    Original file (9703355.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 97-03355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO AUG 2 i Applicant requests that her late husband's records be corrected to reflect that he elected coverage for her under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). c. There were no provisions in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703016

    Original file (9703016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). ~ ~ DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCE PERSONNEL RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS I i U.S. AIR FORCE I ~ s,, MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR FROM HQ AFPCDPPRS 550 C Street West Ste 11 Randolph AFB 7X 78 150-47 13 i DEC 1 6 887 1 9 4 7 - 1 9 9 7 SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records The applicant, while serving in the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9703526

    Original file (9703526.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS JUL 1 4 IN THE MATTER OF: rn COUNSEL: NONE DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03526 HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that the Officer Selection Brief reviewed by the Calendar Year (CY) 1997C (16 June 1997) Major Promotion Board be amended under the Assignment History section to reflect Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) 36P4 versus 3384 on the 15 May 1996 entry, and that she be considered for promotion by Special Selection...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0200656

    Original file (0200656.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 Oct 84, the Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to have is reenlistment eligibility (RE) code changed. He enlisted in the Air Force Reserve for six years on 30 Jun 95 and his Expiration Term of Service (ETS) was 29 Jun 01. The applicant has requested that he be given an age waiver for commissioning as an officer.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02844

    Original file (BC-2002-02844.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant has provided no evidence of a clear error or injustice related to the nonjudicial punishment action. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9601894A

    Original file (9601894A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9601894A.doc

    Original file (9601894A.doc.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 96-01894 INDEX CODE 131.09 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: In a application dated 27 June 1996, applicant requested that the Officer Selection Briefs (OSBs) considered by the Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93), FY94 and FY95 Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF) Colonel Overall Vacancy Selection Boards be...