AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 4 5 9
COUNSEL: MELVIN D. HORTON
HEARING DESIRED: NO
Applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that
he received his upgraded skill level on 23 February 1 9 7 9 and was
promoted to the grade of senior airman, effective and with date
AppI'icant I s
of rank of 23 February 1 9 7 9 , with back pay.
submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C).
The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by
app 1 icant .
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
--
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Mr. Frederick R.
Beaman 111, and Mr. Joseph G . Diamond considered this application
on 1 6 June 1 9 9 8 , in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 3 6 - 2 6 0 3 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1 5 5 2 .
DAVID W-. MULGREW 1
Panel Chair
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion
DEPARTMENT O F THE A I R FORCE
HEADQUARTERS AIR FORCEPERSONNELCENTER
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: AFPC/DPPPWB
550 C Street West, Ste 09
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4711
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting his date of rank (DOR) to senior airman
( S U ) be changed from 1 Nov 80 to 23 Feb 79 and back pay due.
Reason fox Request. Applicant believes because he completed his Career Development
Courses (CDCs) on 17 Feb 79 and received his upgraded skill IeveI 23 Feb 79 that he should
have been promoted on the same date.
Facts. The applicant was promoted to SrA effective and with a date of rank of 1 Nov 80
per AFR 39-29, Table 5, Rule 1 (DOR announced by HQ AFMPC).
Discussion. This application has not been submitted within the three year time limitation.
Promotions to this grade were controlled by the periodic promotion quotas to Major Air
Commands by the Director of Military Personnel, Headquarters USAF. Promotions
accomplished within each Major Air Command were limited to the quotas allocated for each
grade. Quotas were vacancy driven and if there were no vacancies, although individuals were
otherwise eligible, they could not be promoted. Our Monthly Increment Status records indicated
for SrA (E4), time-in-grade (TIG) was between 3 Feb 79 and 2 Mar 79, promotion 1 Nov 80.
His records reflect his date of rank for airman first class (AlC) was 8 Feb79, which made him
eligible to be promoted to SrA 1 Nov 80. In order to have been promoted to SrA during the Feb
79 time fixme as he requests, his date of rank to A1C must have been between 12 Mar 77 and 16
Apr 77. Again, his DOR to AlC was 8 Feb 79 which was not eligible for promotion until 1 Nov
80, the date he was promoted. Consequently, he is nor authorized or entitled to an earlier
promotion date to SrA.
9800459
Recommendation. Denial, based on the rationale provided.
Chief, InquirieslAFBCMR Section
Enlisted Promotion & Mil Testing Br
Attachment:
Extract Cy, AFR 39-29
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03806
On 11 Sep 80, applicant was notified of his commander's intent to vacate the suspended nonjudicial punishment because he again failed to report for duty at the appropriate time. The commander, on 14 Oct 80, determined that applicant was guilty of the offenses and imposed punishment consisting of forfeiture of $224.00 per month for two months, restriction to base for 45 days, and a reduction to the grade of airman basic, with a new date of rank of 14 Oct 80. He had completed a total of 2...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00209
CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD03-0209 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for an Honorable Discharge. The records indicate the applicant was discharged with a General Discharge for Failure in the Alcohol Abuse Rehabilitation Program. (Change Discharge to Honorable) Issue 1: I received a General Under Honorable Conditions due to my failure of the Alcohol Rehabilitation Program at McChord AFB.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00563
During that period there was no performance report, no credit for time in grade and no active duty assignment. On 1 Feb 79, he reenlisted in the Regular Air Force. The applicant contends that by making an exception to policy when he reenlisted in 1979, the Air Force "acknowledged there was no appropriate applicability" of the regulation that barred him from reenlistment in 1978.
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD00-00040
ATR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD ‘NAME OF SERVICE MEMRAER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ~ PERSONAL APPEARANCE AIC GRADE AYSN/S84N X RECORD REVIEW NAME GF COUNSEL AND OK ORGANZA THOM ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION GF COLINSEL — M EMBERS SITTING HON GEN OTHC OTHER DENY at peer “INDEX NUMBER“ "" ERE PRIBIIS SUUMIFTED TO THE BOAR AQLS7 A66.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER GRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE ae et 23...
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). We defer to AFPC/DPPPWB’s advisory which indicates applicant never completed the minimum requirements for promotion to Senior Airman, and therefore, his application should be denied. The applicant is requesting his grade at the time of discharge from the Air Force be changed to reflect senior airman (SRA) (E-4) and not airman first...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01386
Applicant’s DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, Item 27, Remarks, reflects he completed the Non-commissioned Officer Orientation Course in April 1978. They find that the applicant’s records reflect no indication the applicant performed any duties, assigned or attached, with the OSI or EOD. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant reiterated his...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-3688
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03688 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. He provided no other...
AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00152
- ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 07 Dec 2005 APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND TXE BOARD'S DECISKlNAL RATIONAL ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2005-00152 I I Case heard at Washington, D.C. MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used i i AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE...
AF | DRB | CY2002 | FD2002-0177
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDIN.E ENITIAL) “ GRADE AFSN/SSAN ” AB tee = 7 - . CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 1'1902-0177 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. Major eh recommended that Senior Airman be fesued an under other than honorable conditions discharge without suspension for probation and rehabilitation (P & R)- After consulting legal counsel, Senior Airman QQ...
AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00008
A95.00 A66.00 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 9 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE |3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION | —t HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE 18 SUIN'OS FD2005-0008 _ COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE T TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPERANCE HEARING J —— — = APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THE BOARIZ'S DECISIONAL RATIQNAL‘ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIRFORCE: DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. ...