AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDIN.E ENITIAL) “ GRADE AFSN/SSAN ”
AB
tee = 7 - . —...
z _ PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW
SONBEEL NAME GF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION : “| ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ~
[ YES | NO
x
” ™ ~ VOTE OF TIE HOARD -
MEMBERS SITTING HON Gam bornd OTHER | DENY
x
x
X
x
Xx
h ~. " _. vee a a — _
ISSUES INDEX NUMBER EXHUITS SUBMITTET TO VHE BOARD
A95,00 A67.50 1 | ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
| 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 | LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ~
) HEARING DATE ~ CASE NIIMRER ~ 4 | BRIEFORPERSONNED Fite
22 OCT 02 FD2002-0177 COUNSEL 5 RELEASE 10) THE BOARD
“ ADDITIONAL EXTMMITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL. APPEARANCE
“TAPE RECORDING OF PERSCINAT. APPERANCE HEARING

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPLICANT § ISSE AND THE BOARDS DECISIONAL RATIONAL, ARE GISCUSSED ON THR ATTACHED AIR FORCE LSUHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

REMARKS
Case heard at Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance, and the right to submit an application to
the AFBCMR.

 

 

 

INDORSEMENT DATE: 22 OCT 62
Tih “ee fr: Trae Frome” a ae a |
SAF/MLBR SECRETARY GF TILE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
$30 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW GOARID
RANDOLPH ATL, TX 7#150-d742 1335 COMMAND OR, KE WINCH, 3° FLOOR
ANIJJREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002

 

 

“AFHO FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 ~~ (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used.
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE 1'1902-0177

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

‘The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains the available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the
discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The board finds that the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge,
and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was able to identily none that would justify a change of
discharge.

ISSUE: ‘The applicant submitted no issues and requested that the review be complcted based on the
available service record. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or
inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of discharge. The records indicated applicant had
received four Article 15°s, The first one was for possessing marijuana; the second one was for being drunk
on duty, the third for being disorderly and the fourth for operating a vehicle in a reckless manner, being
disrespectful and disorderly. He also received six Letter’s of Reprimand and ten Letter’s of Counscling for
speeding, disorderly conduct, uniform violations, failure to follow procedures, playing dominoes during
commander’s call, substandard duty perlonnance, absent from his duty section without approval, failed to
attend a supervisor safety course, failure to report a vehicle accident, writing worthless checks, late for duty
and having a delinquent DPP account. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the
applicant had ample opportunities to change his ncgative/repetitive behavior. Thc Board concluded the
disciplinary infractions were a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military members.
The Board found no evidence of impropricty or inequity in this case on which to base an upgrade of
discharge.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authorily and that the applicant was provided {ull administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings the board further concludes that there exists no legal or cquitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
FD2002-0177

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ANDREWS AFB, MD

(Former AB) (HGH SGT)

1. MATTER UNDER REVIEW: Appl rec'd a GEN Disch fr USAF 87/11/19 UP AFR 39-10,
para 5-46 (Miaconduct - Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions. Appeals for

Honorable Disch.
2. BACKGROUND:

a. DOB: 63/08/22. Enimt Age: 17 1/12. Disch Age: 24 2/12, Educ: HS DIPL.
AFOT: N/A. A-75, E-73, G-82, M-87. PAFSC: 47252 - General Purpose Vehicle

Mechanic. DAS: 84/04/16,
b. Prior Sv: (1) AFRes 80/10/06 - 80/11/25 (1 Mo 20 Days) (Inactive).

(2) Enld as AB 80/11/26 for 4 yrs. Ext: 93/01/31 for 17 Mos.
SVD: 4 Yre 3 Mos 12 Days, all AMS. AMN - 81/05/26. AlC - 81/11/26. SRA -
84/04/01. APRs: 7,7,8,9,9,9.

3. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW:
a. Reenld as SRA 85/03/08 for 6 yrs. Svd: 2 Yrs 8 Mo 12 Das, all AMS.

b. Grade Status: AB - 87/11/09 (Article 15, 87/11/09)
SRA - 84/04/01 (Vacation, 86/05/29)
SGT - 95/04/01 (Appointed)

e. Time Lost: None

d. Art 15/s: (1) 87/11/09, Aviano AB, Italy, Article 111, Preliminary
investigation has disclosed that you, did, on or about
22 Oct 87, on the North Perimeter Road adjacent to
Building 941 operate a vehicle, to wit: a passenger car
in a reckless manner by apeeding through a posted stop
sign and causing another vehicle operator to react and
brake quickly to avoid a collision with your vehicle.
Atticle 91. Further investigation has disclosed that
you, on or about 22 Oct 97, were disreapectful in
deportment toward Staff Sergeant --------- , a
noncommissioned officer, then known by you to be a
noncommissioned officer, who was then in the execution
of his office, by yelling, arguing and forcing him to
direct you several times to produce your operator's
license before you complied. Article 134. Further
investigation has disclosed that you, were, on or about
22 Oct 87, disorderly, Reduction to the grade of AB,
and forfeiture of $300 pay. (No appeal) (No
mitigation) .
FD2002-0177

(2) 87/03/23, Aviano AB, Italy, Article 134. Preliminary
investigation has disclosed that you, were, on or about
27 Feb 87, disorderly. Suspended reduction to the
grade of AIC, and extra duties for 10 days.
(No appeal) (No mitigation)

{3} 86/03/28, Aviano AB, Italy, Article 112. Preliminary
investigation has disclosed that you, were, on or about
18 Mar 86, found drunk while on duty as a vehicle
mechanic. Suapended reduction to the grade of Alc.
(No appeal) (No mitigation) .

{4) 82/01/12, Luke AFB, AZ, Articles 134 & 92. You did, on
or about 2 Dec 81, wrongfully have in your possession
some quantity of marijuana. Further, you, having
received a lawful order issued by Airman First Clags --
aes a security policeman then in the execution of
hig duties, to halt, an order which it was your duty to
obey, did, on or about 2 Dee 41, fail to obey the same.
Suspended reduction to the grade of AMN, and forfeiture

of $200.00. {No appeal) (No mitigation).
&@,. Additional: LOR, 27 MAR 87 - Excessive speeding resulting in a vehicle

accident .

LOR, 23 MAR 867 Disorderly conduct.

Roc, 19 FEB 87 Violation of duty uniform standards.

LOR, 17 FEB 87 Failure to follow procedures.

ROC, 2 FEB 47 Playing dominoes during commander's call.

Roc, 5 NOV 4&6 Substandard duty performance.

Roc, 20 AUG 86 - Absent from duty section without approval
of supervigor,

LOR, 16 MAY 86 Failed to attend a supervisor safety
Course.

ROC, 22 APR 86 Failure to perform supervisory dutiea.

ROC, 7 APR 86 Uniform violation.

LOR, 27 JAN &86 Failure to report a vehicle accident.

Roc, 16 JAN 86 Writing worthless checka.

ROC, 7 JAN §6 Delinquent DPP account.

ROC, 30 SEP 85 Late for duty.

LOR, 26 JUL 85 Driving recklessly.

Roc, 24 Jun 95 Late for an appointment.

f. CM: None.

q. Record of 8V;

85/02/10 - 86/02/09 Aviano AB 7 (Annual)
86/02/10 - 86/09/06 Aviano AB 7 (CRO)
86/09/07 - 87/03/08 Aviano AB & (CRO)

h. Awards & Deca:

(Discharged from McGuire AFB)

AFOUA, AFGCM, AFOSTR, AFOLTR, AFLSAR, SAEMR, AFTR.
FD2002-0177
i, Stmt of Sv: TMS: (7) ¥re (1) Mo (14) Das
TAMS: (6) Yre (11) Mos (24) Das

4. BASIS ADVANCED FOR REVIEW: Appln (DD Fm 293) dtd 02/04/16,
(Change Discharge to Honorable)

NO ISSUES SUBMITTED.

ATCH
None,

02/08/23/cer
REPLY TO
ATTN OF:

SUBJECT;

FO:

a2epo2- O17 7
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE *

HEADQUARTERS SUXTEENTH AIR FORCE {USAFE}
APO NEW YORK 09283-6000

JA 4 May 1987

Legal Review: . Conditional Waiver of AER 39-10 Administrative Discharge Board
Hearing - SrA 4 mer FR
cc

1. sis for Action. On 17 April 8&7, the 40 TRNSPS/CC, Major sper
wn initiated action to discharge SrA F pursuant to AFR 39-10,
paragraph 5-46 for minor disciplinary infractions. Major Wheatley recommended
that SrA MMM be furnished a Under Other Than Honorable Conditions(UOTHC)
discharge without suspension for probation and rehabilitation (P&R). SrA

Mee submitted a waiver of his right to a hearing before an administrative
discharge board. This waiver is conditioned upon his receipt of no less than

a general discharge. The 40 TACG/CC has recommended that you accept this
waiver and separate the respondent with a general discharge without P&R.

      

2. Summary of Evidence for the Government. The basis for the discharge
action 7s 18 minor discTplinary infractions committed within the previous two

year period. The infractions consisted of incidents of being drunk in duty,
reckless driving, being disorderly, AFR 35-10 violations, negligent duty
performance, failures to go and financial irresponsibility. He received 6
letters of reprimand, 2 Article 15's, 10 records of counseling, and vacation
of NCO status in connection with his misconduct.

3. Summary of Evidence for the Respondent

a. The respondent is entitled to wear the Air Force Training Ribbon, and
the Air Force Longevity Service Award.

b. The respondent has received the following ratings on his APRs, in
chronological order: 7, 7, 8, 9, 9, 9, 7, 7, 8.

4, Errors and Irregularities. the case file contains no errors or
irregularities which Substantially prejudice the material rights of the

respondent. We have verified that in recommending acceptance of the waiver,
the 40 TACG/CC understood the initiating commander had recommended a UOTHC
discharge.

5. Options. As the separation authority in this action, you may

a. accept the respondent's conditional waiver and separate him from the
Air Force with an honorable or general discharge, with or without P&R;

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

SEPTEMBER 18,1947
Right People. Right Mission. Right Now.
FO2002 ~ 0177

b. reject the respondent's waiver, in which case he could elect to submit

an unconditional waiver or to appear before an administrative discharge board;
or

c. direct retention,

6. Discussion. The attached case file is legally sufficient to support
discharge actTfon under AFR: 39-10, paragraph 5-46. Although a UOTHC is
authorized, the normal characterization is General for a discharge under para
5-46. According to AFR 39-10, para 1-18, characterization of service as
general is warranted when significant negative aspects of the airman's conduct
or performance of duty outweigh positive aspects of the airman's military
record. This fits well in this case. Suspension of the discharge for P&R is
inappropriate because of the large number of rehabilitative measures which
have already been attempted without success.

7. Recommendatio That you accept the respondent's conditional waiver and
direct that” SrA evar be separated from the Air Force with a general
discharge without suspension for P&R.

Assistant Staff Judge Advocate

dad the discharge case file on SrA ean 1 concur with the

aid ons oF Ene reviewer.

     
     
   

   
 
   

I have

 

rer Colonel, USAF
ge "Advocate

  

Staff Juda
[512 2.002 - OFT
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE |

HEADQUARTERS 40TH TACTICAL GROUP (USAFE)
APO NEW YORK 09293-5000

 

REPLY 70 ,
aT ar; JA APR 2 1 1887
SUBJECT: al Review - AFR 39-10 Administrative Discharge (Senior Airman ah.
| , 40th Transportation Squadron)
1. Legal Review: After a careful review of the above case, I find it to be

legally sufficient to separate Senior le eam ctearrentee a general
discharge under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-46, for minor disciplinary infractions.

2. Og

 

_—

        
  
    

pril 1987, the 40th Transportation Squadron commander,

ag a: initiated action to discharge Senior Airman well
RIOT a sconduct, “specifically, minor, disciplinary infractions pursuant

to AFR 39- -10, paragraph 5-46. Major eh recommended that Senior Airman

be fesued an under other than honorable conditions discharge without
suspension for probation and rehabilitation (P & R)- After consulting legal
counsel, Senior Airman QQ submitted a conditional waiver, dated 20 April
1987, offering to forego an administrative discharge board hearing on the
condition that he receive no less than a general discharge.

Lt A

  

3. Summary of Evidence for the Government:

 

 

a- The basis for the discharge action is the following:

(1) On 22 March 1987, the respondent drove at an excessive speed

causing a motor vehicle accident for which he received a letter of reprimand
on 27 March 1987,

(2) On 27 February 1987, the respondent was disorderly for which he
received an Article 15 on 23 March 1987 and a commensurate suspended reduction
to the grade of Airman First Class (E-3) effective that date.

(3) On 20 February 1987, the respondent broke two windows and used
vulgar language towards residents at Via Dante #1, Aviano, Italy, for which he
received a letter of reprimand on 23 March 1987.

(4) On 19 February 1987, the respondent was not in uniform while at
his duty station for which he received a record of counseling on that date.

(5) On 5 February 1987, the respondent fatled to follow preacribed
procedures in servicing a tire mounted on a split type wheel assembly, which
caused the wheel to explode and injure him. For thia offense, the respondent
received a letter of reprimand on 17 February 1987.

(6) On 29 January 1987, the respondent was playing dominoes during

commander's call for which he received a record of counseling on 2 February
1987.

Right People. Right Mission. Right Now.
Ep 2002-077

(7) The respondent's substandard duty performance caused him to
receive a tecord of counseling on 5 November 1986.

(8) On 19 August 1986, the respondent improperly left his duty
station without informing hia supervisor for which he received a record of

counseling on 20 August 1986.

(9) On 29 April 1986, the respondent failed to attend a supervisor
safety course for which he received a letter of reprimand on 16 May 1986.

(103 On 22 April 1986, the respondent failed to ensure his hay orderly
was on duty for which he received a record of counseling on that date.

(11) Gn 7 April 1986, the respondent's uniform waa not in conformity
with AFR 35-10 for which he received a record of counseling on that date.

(12) On 18 March 1986, the respondent was drunk while on duty as a

vehicle mechanic for which he received an Article 15 on 28 March 1986 and a
commensurate suspended reduction to the grade of Airman Firat Class (E~3)

effective that date.

(13) The respondent wrote checks totalling $47.50 againat insufficient
funds for which he was counseled on 16 January 1986.

(14) The respondent failed to report his 21 November 1985 motor
vehicle accident for which he received a letter of reprimand on 27 January
L986.

(15) On 30 September 1985, the respondent failed to report for duty on
time for which he received a record of counseling on that date.

(16) On 27 September 1985, the respondent reported one hour and
fifteen minutes late for duty for which he received a record of counseling.

(17) On 16 July 1985, the respondent operated his vehicle on a no—

thoroughfare street and on 18 July 1985, the respondent sped over 50
kilometers per hour over the posted speed limit. For these offenses, the

Tespondent received a letter of reprimand on 26 July 1985.

(18) On 20 June 1985, the respondent failed te attend his NCO
Leadership School briefing at the scheduled time for which he received a
tecord of counseling on 24 June 1985.

b. Additional Derogatory Data: The respondent was counseled on 7 January
1986 concerning his delinquent DEP account- On 23 May 1986, the respondent
was relieved of his dorm chief responsibilities because of his poor
performance in the position. On three occasions; 26 January 1982, 16 May 1986
and 9 June 1986, the respondent was denied the Ait Force Good Conduct Medal.
The respondent's NCO status was vacated on 29 May 1986.
FO2002- 0177

4. Summary of Evidence for the Respondent: In approximately six years and

five months of service, the respondent has received just under an “8” as an

avetage of his overall ratings on his nine airman performance reports. The

fespondent has also received the Air Force Training Ribbon and the Air Force
Longevity Service Award Ribbon. The respondent hae submitted a conditional

waiver of his right to an administrative discharge on the condition that he

receive no less than 4 general discharge.

 

5. Errors and Irregularities: None,

6. Discussion: Based upon respondent's eighteen separate actions of winor
misconduct, discharge is appropriate under AFR 39-10, paragraph 5-46.
Administrative separation of respondent is long overdue. Two Article 15
actions, aix letters of reprimand and ten counselings have been administered
to this respondent. In spite of his hefty disciplinary record, the
respondent's conditional waiver should be accepted. His overall service
record has some positive aspects and may warrant a peneral diacharge.
Additionally, acceptance of the waiver saves the Government the time and
expense of convening a discharge board.

7. Commander's Options: As the special court-martial convening authority in
this action, you have the following options:

ae Reject the conditional waiver and direct the respondent to submit an
unconditional waiver or request a board hearing within three workdays; or

b. Recommend acceptance of the conditional waiver and send the package to
16AF/CC for final action with one of the following recommendations:

(1) Retain the respondent in the United States Air Force;

(2) Discharge the respondent with an honorable discharge with or
without suspension for probation and rehabilitation; or

(3) Discharge the respondent wlth a general discharge with or without
suspension for probation and rehahilitation.

In addition, the letter to 16AF/CC must state why the conditional waiver
should be accepted and how the member's military record warrants the type of
diacharge you recommend.

8. Recommendation: I recommend that you forward the conditional waiver ta

16AF/CC with the recommendation that Sentor Airman ee »- issued a
ang reha

general discharge without suspension for probation tation due to

the convenlence to the government and Senior Areca ieee overall military
record, ai

 
  
 

 

   

es — : Captain, USAF
Acting Staff Judge Advocate
FIO 2002 ~O1T7

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEARQUARTERS 40TH TACTICAL GROUP {USAFE}
APO NEW YORK 09293-5000

 

AEPLY TO

aor: 40 TRNSPS/CC APR 1? 1987

suuect: Letter of Notification ~ Board Hearing

"SrA ROAM eilpasae
40 TRNSPS/LGTM

1. F am recommending your discharge from the United States Air Force for
minor disciplinary infractions according to AFR 39-10, under the provisions of
paragraph 5-46. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation
authority to support this recommendation are attached.

2. My reasons for this action are:

a. Your excessive speed caused you to have a motor vehicle accident on 22
. Mar 87 for which you received a letter of reprimand on 27 Mar 87.

b. You were disorderly on 27 Feb 87 for which you received an Article 15

on 23 Mar 87 and a commensurate suspended reduction to the grade of AIC (E-3)
effective that date.

c. You broke two windows and used vulgar language towards residents at
Via Dante #1, Aviano, Italy, on 20 Feb 87, for which you received a letter of
reprimand on 23 Mar 87.

d. You were not in uniform while at your duty station on 19 Feb 87 for
which you received a record of counseling on 19 Feb 87.

e. You failed to follow prescribed procedures in servicing a tire mounted
on a split type wheel assembly on 5 Feb 87, which caused the wheel to explode
and injure you, for which you received a letter of reprimand on 17 Feb 87.

f. You were playing dominoes during commander's call on 29 Jan 87 for
which you received a record of counseling on 2 Feb 87.

g. Your substandard duty performance caused you to receive a record of
counseling on 5 Nov 86.

h. You improperly left your duty station without informing your

supervisor on 19 Aug 86 for which you received a record of counseling on 20
Aug 86.

~ UNITED STATES AIR FORCE

SEPTEMBER 18, 1947
Right People. Right Mission. Aight Now.
FP 2002~ ©1797

i. You failed to attend a supervisor safety course on 29 Apr 86 for which
you received a letter of reprimand on 16 May 86,

j. You failed to ensure your bay orderly was on duty on 22 Apr 86 for
which you received a record of counseling on 22 Apr 86.

k. Your uniform was not in conformity with AFR 35-10 on 7 Apr 86 for
which you received a record of counseling on 7 Apr 86.

1. You were drunk while on duty as a vehicle mechanic on 18 Mar 86 for
which you received an Article 15 on 28 Mar 86 and a commensurate suspended
reduction to the grade of AIC (E-3) effective that date.

m. You wrote checks totalling $47.50 against insufficient funds for which
you were counseled on 16 Jan 86.

n. You failed to report your 21 Nov 85 motor vehicle accident for which
you received a letter of reprimand on 27 Jan 86.

o. You failed to report for duty on time on 30 Sep 85 for which you
received a record of counseling on 30 Sep 85.

p- You reported one hour and fifteen minutes late for duty on 27 Sep 85
for which you received a record of counseling on 27 Sep 85.

q. You operated your vehicle on a no-throughfare street on 16 Ju} 85 and
you were speeding over 50 KMH over the posted speed limit on 18 Jul 85. For
these offenses you received a letter of reprimand on 26 Ju}. 85.

r. You failed to attend your NCO Leadership School briefing at the
scheduled time on 20 Jun 85 for which you received a record of counseling on
24 dun 85,

3. This action could result in your separation with an under other than
honorable conditions discharge. I am recommending that you receive an under
other than honorable conditions discharge. The commander exercising SPCM
jurisdiction or a higher authority wil] make the final decision in this
matter. If you are discharged, you wil? be ineligible for reenlistment in the
Air Force.
FP 2002-0179

4. You have the right to:
a. Consult legal counsel.
b. Present your case to an administrative discharge board.
c. Be represented by legal counsel at a board hearing.

d. Submit statements in your own behalf in addition to, or in lfeu of,
the board hearing.

e. Waive the above rights. You must consult legal counsel before making
a decision to waive any of your rights.

5. You were scheduled for a medical examination which you received on 13 Apr
87, 0700 hours, at the flight surgeon's office. No further medical
examination will be required.

6. Military Yegal counsel, Captain SRR at the Area Defense Counsel's
office, bldg 262, has been obtained to assist you. An appointment has been
scheduled for you to consult him on 20 Apr 87 at 0900 Hrs. Instead of the
appointed counsel, you may have another, if the lawyer you request is in the
active military service and is reasonably available as determined according to
AFR 111-1. In addition to military counsel, you have the right to employ
civilian counsel. The Air Force does not pay expenses incident to the
employment of civilian counsel. Civilian counsel, if employed, must be
readily available. ‘

7. Confer with your counsel and reply, in writing, within 7 workdays,
specifying the rights you choose to exercise. The statement must be signed in
the presence of your counsel who also will sign it. If you waive your right
to a hearing before an administrative discharge board, you may submit written
statements in your own behalf. I will send the statements to the discharge
authority with the case file to be considered with this recommendation. If
you fail to respond, your failure will constitute a waiver of the right to the
board hearing.

8. Any personal information you furnish in rebuttal is covered by the Privacy
Act Statement as explained in AFR 39-10, attachment 6. A copy of AFR 39-10 is
available for your use at the Area Defense Counsel's office.
9, Execute the attached acknowledgenent and return it to me immediately.

 

3 Atch
1. Supporting documents for the
reasons for discharge
a. Ltr of Reprimand, 27 Mar 87
b. Aritcle 15 Action, 23 Mar 87
c. Ltr of Reprimand, 23 Mar 87
d. Rec of Counseling, 19 Feb 87
e. Ltr of Reprimand, 17 Feb 87
f. Rec of Counseling, 2 Feb 87
gq. Rec of Counseling, 5 Nov 8&6
h. Rec of Counseling, 20 Aug 86
{. Ltr of Reprimand, 16 May 86
. Rec of Counseling, 22 Apr 86
» Rec of Counseling, 7 Apr 86
. Article 15 Action, 28 Mar 86
- Rec of Counseling, 16 dan 8&6
Ltr of Reprimand, 27 Jan 86
Rec of Counseling, 30 Sep 85
. Rec of Counseling, 27 Sep 85
Ltr of Reprimand, 26 Jul 85
. Rec of Counseling, 24 Jun &5

*

*

=aomona Ss a eu.

‘2. Documents containing derogatory
information which are not listed in
letter of notification

a. Denial of AF Good Conduct Medal
9 Jun 86

b. Yacation of NCO Status (AF Fom
418), 29 May 86

c. Withdrawal from Dorm Chief Duty
23 May 86

d. Denial of AF Good Conduct Meda]
16 May 86

e. AFEES DPP Program delinquency,
2 Jan 86

f. Denial of AF Good Conduct Medal
2b Jan 82

3. Airman's acknowledgement