AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
JUN 2 3 1998
IN THE MATTER OF:
DOCKET NO: 97-03802
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO -
t
Applicant requests that his date of separation from active duty
be changed. Applicant's submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request
and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinion appear to be based on the
evidence of record and have not been rebutted by applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied rights to which
entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or
appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis- to
disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
'Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board, Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Mr. Thomas S .
Markiewicz, and Mr. Michael P. Higgins considered this
application on 17 June 1998, in accordance with the provisions of
Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and the governing statute, 10
U.S.C. 1552.
DAVID c. v@ G
f - Panel Chad'r
A
!K
~
Exhibits:
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinion
D. SAF/MLBR L t r Forwarding Advisory Opinion
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Accordingly, applicant's request is denied. Applicant requests the Air Force Overseas Short Tour Ribbon be added to his records.
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS NOV 3 3 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 97- 03814 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No - Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of er or Discharge) be corrected to show overseas service in from January 1957 to December 1958 during his four-year enlistment in the Air Force. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant’s request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The Air Force states based on information contained in applicant‘s application, the narrative reason for separation has been corrected to read “Officer Training Program.” The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant f o r review and response (Exhibit D) . Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Applicant’s response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action.
Exhibit A. evaluated applicant's request The appropriate Air Force office to the Board recommending the and provided an advisory opinion The advisory opinion was application be denied (Exhibit C ) . Applicant's response to the advisory opinion is at Exhibit E. After careful consideration of applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. All other aviation cadet graduates of air crew training will...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D). Based on the above, we recommend denial of applicant’s request for correction of RE code.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C ) . The applicant is requesting several actions we will address the one requesting the Board restore him to the rank of Airman Second Class. - Based upon the information provided we are forwarding this application for correction of military records without recommendation.
RECORD AIR FORCE BOARD FOR OF PROCEEDINGS CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ;gJJ I 3 -sS IN THE MATTER OF: -.-- DOCKET NUMBER: 9 8 - 0 0 6 3 8 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No Applicant requests that his DD Form 214 ( C e r t i f i c a t e of Release o r Discharge From Active Duty) be c o r r e c t e d t o r e f l e c t award of t h e Small A r m s Expert Marksmanship Ribbon. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the...
I " AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ' JUL 2 4 1998 IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NO: 98-00643 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO Applicant requests that he be paid for accrued leave not verified on his DD Form 214. The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). The applicant claims that he did not take this leave and did not receive payment...