RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
DOCKET NUMBER: 97-03125
SEP 2 3 1998
IN THE MATTER OF:
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
Applicant requests that his rank of Airman Second Class be
restored, he receive payment for 60 days accrued leave,
reimbursement of forfeited pay, and separation and travel pay.
He also requests that he receive recognition of the Expert Badge,
Presidential Unit Citation and 7-Level AFSC.
Applicant's
submission is at Exhibit A.
The appropriate Air Force offices evaluated applicant's request
and provided advisory opinions to the Board recommending the
application be denied (Exhibit C ) .
The advisory opinions were
forwarded to the applicant for review and response (Exhibit D).
Applicant's response to the advisory opinions is at Exhibit E.
On 17 July 1996, the Board considered and recommended approval of
applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable.
The Board concluded that no error was made in the discharge
action taken against him; however, based on his post-service
record, his discharge was upgraded based on clemency.
After careful consideration of applicant's request and the
available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of
error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and
opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on
the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by
applicant.
Absent persuasive evidence applicant was denied
rights to which entitled, appropriate regulations were not
followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no
basis to disturb the existing record.
Accordingly, applicant's request is denied.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been
shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
The Board staff is directed to inform applicant of this decision.
Applicant should also be informed that this decision is final and
will only be reconsidered upon the presentation of new relevant
evidence which was not reasonably available at the time the
application was filed.
Members of the Board Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Mr. Jackson A.
Hauslein, and Mr. Terry A. Yonkers considered this application on
27 August 1998, in accordance with the provisions of Air Force
Instruction 36-2603 and the governing statute, 10 U.S.C. 1552.
Exhibits:
n
DAVID w. MULGREW d
Panel Chair
A. Applicant's DD Form 149
B. Available Master Personnel Records
C. Advisory Opinions
D. AFBCMR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinions
E. Applicant's Response
D E P A R T M E N T O F THE AIR FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
R A N D O L P H AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: AFPC/DPPPWB
550 C Street West, Ste 09
Randolph AFB TX 78150-471 1
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records
Requested Action. The applicant is requesting several actions we will address the one
requesting the Board restore him to the rank of Airman Second Class.
Reason for Request. Applicant believes that errors and injustice occurred before his trial
even began.
Facts. See AFLSA/JAJM Ltr 14 Nov 97
Discussion. This application has not been submitted within the three year time limitation.
A review of the records reflects that the highest grade he held while on active duty was airman
second class, with date of rank of 11 Feb 59. The applicant was reduced to airman basic by
Special Court Martial O r d e r e a t e d 24 May 61. The AFBCMR upgraded the applicant’s
discharge to an Honorable discharge on 17 Jul96. It did not grant relief from his court-martial
sentence, therefore, he was discharged in his proper grade of airman basic. The applicant was
promoted to A2C (E-3) on 11 Feb 59.
Recommendation. We defer to the recommendation of AFLSA/JAJM.
&ZM&
Chief, InquiriedBCMR Section
Enlisted Promotion & Mil Testing Br
D E P A R T M E N T OF T H E AIR FORCE
H E A D Q U A R T E R S AIR FORCE P E R S O N N E L C E N T E R
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE B A S E T E X A S
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: HQ AFPCDPPPRA
550 C Street West Ste 12
Randolph AFB TX 78150-4714
10 April 1998
SUBJEC
Records (DD Form 149)
1. REQUESTED ACTION. Applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect award
of the Presidential Unit Citation.
2. BASIS FOR REQUEST. Applicant provided nothing to substantiate his claim.
3. FACTS.
a. The unit to which the applicant was assigned never earned the Presidential Unit Citation’
(Atch 1).
b Applicant is entitled to the National Defense Service Medal, which has been added to his
DD Form 214.
4. DISCUSSION. Since the applicant’s unit never earned the Presidential Unit Citation, he is
not eligible for this unit award.
5. RECOMMENDATION.
We recommend disapproval of the applicant’s request to have his DD Form 214 corrected to
reflect award of the Presidential Unit Citation.
FOR THE COMMANDER I
GEORGIA A. ‘WSE, DAFC
Recognition PrQgrams Branch
Promotions, Eval & Recognition Div
DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE
DENVER CENTER
6760 E. IRVINGTON PLACE
DENVER, COLORADO 80279
DFAS-DE/FYCC
MAY ? 6 I998
MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
ATTN: AFBCMR
SUBJECT: Application for Correction of Military Records
?
We examin.ed the application for correction of military
records for
are unable to
sought on only one item, we are forwarding it for your
consideration.
. Since we
e the relief
The applicant is requesting several corrective actions. We
are addressing only the portion pertaining to his payment of
accrued leave. His request pertaining to reimbursement of
forfeited pay while incarcerated for 154 days, and separation
travel pay would depend on his court-martial being overturned by
the board.
The former member’s military pay records are no longer
available to verify any claim for leave not paid at separation.
Payment can only be made if upheld by government records or other
substantiating documents that reflect his leave balance at
separation. If these documents are forwarded to our office by
the payment of accrued leave can
administratively. A copy of our letter to
is attached.
-
Based upon the information provided we are forwarding this
application for correction of military records without
recommendation. Any action taken by this office for reimbursement
of forfeited pay and separation travel pay will be determined by
the board‘s decision on the applicant’s request.
Our address is DFAS-DE/FYCC, 6760 East Irvington Place,
Denver, Colorado 80279-7100. Our point of contact is
and she may be reached at DSN 926-4790 or commercial
( 3 0 3 ) 676-4790.
Diana E. Settelmeyer
Chief, Claims Branch
Directorate of Debt and Claims
Management
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
A I R F O R C E L E G A L S E R V I C E S A G E N C Y ( A F L S A )
MEMORANDUM FOR AFBCMR
FROM: AFLSNJAJM (Major Self)
112 Luke Avenue, Room 343
Bolling Air Force Base, DC 20332-8000
SUBJECT: Correction of Military Records
14 Nov 97
Applicant's request: In an application dated 29 August 1997, the applicant
requests that the Board restore him to the rank of Airman Second Class with 26 months
time in grade, payment for 60 days accrued leave, reimbursement of forfeited pay, and
separation and travel pay. He also requests certain miscellaneous personnel items be
corrected in his record. The applicant was court-martialed in 1961. The application is
therefore not within the three-year filing window provided by 10 U.S.C. 1552(b).
Facts of military justice action: The applicant was convicted on 18 Apr 61 ,
pursuant to his guilty plea, at trial by special court-martial of violating a lawful order of a
superior noncommissioned officer. He was sentenced to a Bad Conduct Discharge
(BCD), forfeiture of $70 pay per month for six months, six months confinement, and
reduction to E- 1. The applicant had a previous summary court-martial conviction for
disrespect to a superior noncommissioned officer. On 25 Sep 61 , the Air Force Discharge
Review Board suspended the BCD until 25 Mar 62. The applicant was subsequently
administratively discharged from the Air Force with an Under Other than Honorable
Conditions discharge on 3 Nov 61. The AFBCMR upgraded the applicant's discharge to
an Honorable discharge on 17 Jul 96. It did not grant relief from his court-martial
sentence.
The applicant urges the Board to restore his rank and grant him back pay along
with pay for accrued leave, forfeited pay and travel pay. The applicant has not provided
any evidence to challenge the legal sufficiency of his court-martial conviction or
sentence. He asks that he be granted sentence relief as a matter of equity because his
sentence was too severe. The upgrade of the character of his administrative discharge
would not automatically include sentence reiief from his court-martial sentence. They are
two entirely separate issues. However, AFI 36-2603, para 7.2.2 states that DFAS settles
pay claims on the basis of corrected military records and any issues regarding
entitlements to pay should be directed to them. Issues regarding corrections to his
personnel records should be directed to HQ AFPC.
Many evacuees who took an advance later received a waiver of one month's basic pay and did not have to repay the advance. DFAS-DE/FYCC EVALUATION: The Chief , Claims Branch, DFAS-DE/FYCC, evaluated this and confirms that the applicant was stationed at rom 10' November 1989 through 9 June 1991. was advanced $ 1991 while he was stationed a A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00744 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: rtment of the Air Force be corrected to show that on 4 November 1996, but on that date, his enlistment of 5 November 1990 was extended for a period of 61...
The appropriate Air Force office evaluated applicant's request and provided an advisory opinion to the Board recommending the application be denied (Exhibit C). Available Master Personnel Records C. Advisory Opinion D. SAF/MIBR Ltr Forwarding Advisory Opinion DEFENSE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING SERVICE DENVER CENTER 6760 E. IWINGTON PLACE DENVER, COLORADO 80279 DFAS-DE/FYCC MEMORANDUM FOR AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS ATTN: AFBCMR SUBJECT: Application for Correction of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00151
* Reason and A u t h o r i t y + R e e n l i s t m e n t Code I C-..-.-..-..-..-..-..-..-..-.-..,,-..-,.,..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-.......-..-..-..-..-..-....-..-..-..-..-..-..-..t - TO: SAFMRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 781 50-4742 V~~~~~~~~~~~ FROM: - DATE: 1218R006 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10761-7001 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-01 742 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United Sta$es Code, Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: , records of the Department of the Air Force relating to- be corrected to show...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00272
)RD kLOOK ANOREWS AFR, MD 20762-7002 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used I 1 C I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NClMBtiR FD-2005-00272 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general. CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. ...
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC JU"l2 1998 Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00046 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: Th Force r show th el to Permane he is a Federal 23 June tment of the...
AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00471
The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, a Vacation, and two Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed. Sleeping on Post During the time I was under investigation for the fire alarm incident, I was pulling guard duty.
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 98-00118 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code, and Air Force Instruction 36- 2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent mili nt of the Air be corrected to Force relating to orce Reserve...
# DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR 97-00442 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that: .. of the Departmeat of the Air Force relating to- e corrected to show that he had no other alternative but to mercial travel office (CTO) not under...