NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8445 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8454 13
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8455 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s dependents exercised the “layover option”, vice Consecutive Overseas Tour (COT) leave. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8456 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for early return of dependents (ERD), and adjust entitlement to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23 June 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8459-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board.requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and,: pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8470-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ~ 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,’ filed enclosure (1) with this Board , requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval. 2; The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8481 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board_consisted ———..- of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, wien applying for a correction of an official naval record, thé burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8486 13
‘Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his promotion date of rank be changed from 1 September 2012 to 1 April 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8491-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 8. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC ltr 5420 PERS-93/28718 dtd SS, (3) Subject’s naval record 1.. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter: referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to issue an immediate reenlistment contract . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8499 13
You requested removing the fitness report for 14 February to 10 June 2011 and your two rebuttals, each dated 8 June 2011, to the service record page 11 ("Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 25 May and 1 June 2011, respectively. Rh three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2015. Since the Board found insufficient grounds to remove either of your failures of selection for promotion, it had...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8503 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8506 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8513 13
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO Memo 97920 Ser N130D2/14U0900 of 9 Jul 14, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. NR8513-13 n the applicant te demonstrate the naval record, the burden is o 1 error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8514 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitte support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8517 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Fvaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 22 October 2013, and the advisory opinion from HQMC dated 8 January 2014, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8518-13
2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Chapman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 Maxch 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8519 13
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. On 19 October 2007 an administrative discharge board recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8527 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8532 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2014. in addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 October 2013, the e- Mail from HQMC dated 19 November 2013, and the advisory opinions from HOMC dated 25 March 2014 with enclosure and 8 May 2014, copies of which are attached, - After careful and conscientious...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8533 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicabie naval record be corrected to show reimbursement of commercial airfare ticket. Note: Petitioner transferred from CNSWG ‘THREE, D: or about 11 May 2012, and arrived to S NAVSCOL, on 12 May 2012. BARBARA A. NAHULAK ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Recorder Recorder n of authority set out in Section 6(e) he Board for Correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8534 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-312 of ip @ 2 copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8536 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N32 of 6 May 14, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the,zburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8538-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). : CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and ; especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8542-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval record be corrected by removing the 10 December 2007 nonjudicial punishment (NUP). The Board consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Gattis, and Lippolis, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should he taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8547 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8548-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract and agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8551-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter | referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . ‘The Board, consisting of Mr, “Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on > 18 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8554 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO8554-13 > official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8557 13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Therefore, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR856-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8564 13
in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 19 February 2014, a copy of which is attached. The Board also considered your Counsel letter dated 16 April 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8578-13
application for correction Of - your naval record pursuant | to ‘the. provisions of 10 usc L5S20° A three-member panel Of “the ‘Board for Correction of Naval “Records, sitting in executive session, considered ‘your —. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8581 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner’s incapacitated child was not enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8582-13
requesting, in é¢ffect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8586 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying tor a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8594 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an enlistment/reenlistment document. This change will entitle the member to a zone “A” SRB for MOS 0321 (E-5), which is capped at $63,000 for 48 months of additional obligated service. 5 Mar 14 Riearenaiaels cmmmene ROBERT D. 4SALMAN Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR860 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. On 20 July 1984, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8602 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8611 13
— Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested fitness report for 2 June 2011 to 28 February 2012 by filing a Memorandum for the Record showing that section A, item 6.a (“Commendatory Material”) is marked, and including in section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional Comments”) “Directed Comments: Item 6A: MRO [Marine reported on] was awarded a Meritorious Mast and two Letters of Appreciation during this reporting period.” A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8634 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice in your application. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket Mo.NRO8634-13 1...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8636 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8639 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8651 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the RE-4 (non-recommendation for retention) for reentry code issued on 9 August 2013 be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Lippolis, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8666 13
The Board also considered your letters dated 30 July and 15 November 2014, each with enclosures. which after careful and conscientious consideration of the entir the Board found that the evidence submitted was insuff3 establish the existence of probable material error or in this connection, the Board substantially concurre opinion dated 20 August 2014. accordingly: your application has peen denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR867 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct. On 31 December 1996, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for reenlistment) reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8674 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2014. in addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 7200 RFF-11 dated 7 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8675 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8682 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.