NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8289 13
Evidence is considered to be material if it is likely to have a substantial effect on the outcome of the prior Board's decision. The Board was not persuaded by the following issues, your counsel presented: 1) that it was unreasonable for Petitioner to respond to an advisory opinion (A/O) by the SBP Manager that was not fully formed, 2) that Petitioner should not have to agree to pay an undetermined amount of money prior to the Board's decision, and 3) that.there is a lack of an opinion from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8290 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Dac Docket No. ‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2014. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8292 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO8292-13 9 December 2014 . The Board, consisting of a, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 December 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8294 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. w - Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8296 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8299 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval récord, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8304 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8311 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted’ of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8315 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify administrative remarks. The Petitioner enlisted in the U.S. Navy on qn and on both the record of military processing (DD Form 1966) and enlisted/reenlistment document (DD Form 4), home of record was listed as Smal Documentation from a reenlistment (NAVPERS 1070/6041) listed home of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8317 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8321 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8329 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) memo of 17 Jul 2014, a copy of which was provided to ‘you en 11 Aug 2014. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8330 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your two NUP’s, one of which was after you were notified that you were being administratively separated for a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8332 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8333 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8335-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/BM1 from the August 2011 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed_Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8336 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8340 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 1 October 1986, the separation authority directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8343-13
Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8344 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. on 20 August 1986, you received NUP for breaking restriction.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8348 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying For a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8350 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and claim that you were told that in six months your Docket No.NRO8350-13 discharge would be automatically upgraded to a honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8355 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NRO08355-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8357 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2014. However, on 12 March 1975, the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) upgraded your BCD to a general discharge for the convenience of the government. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8359 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code issued on 7 September 2011 be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Mr. Lippolis, Mr. Rothlein, and Ms. Montgomery, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8360 13
the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2014. New évidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8361 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 30 September 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (neither of which is in his Official Military Personnel File) and 10 October 2013 with his rebuttal of the same date (copies at Tab A). The Board, consisting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8362 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable service and request to have a Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) issued prior Docket No.NR08362-13 .to your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8365 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing any and all derogatory material regarding. e. An AO received from the HQOMC Military Justice Branch, Judge Advocate Division (JAM), enclosure (5), regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the NJP, page 11, and all related references thereto, recommended relief be granted because he self-reported that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8367 13
8367-13 28 January 2015 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Petitioner was released from active duty on 9 December 2005 by reason of completion of required active service, and assigned a reentry code of RE-1A, which indicates he was recommended and considered eligible for reenlistment at that time. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8368 13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Gattis, and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on-.3 September 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. An AO, enclosure (4), received from the Marine Corps regarding Petitioner’s request to remove the incomplete documentation recommends relief. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8370 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel an agreement to extend enlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8373 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was authorized per diem entitlements during his Temporary Duty to 2. error and injustice on 30 June 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8377 13
Pursuant to.the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. “salman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8379 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to issue an immediate reenlistment contract. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8383 13
Option “A” (Declined (Immediate Annuity), coverage due to her narriage’, enclosure she thought she would Cx Petitioner was sent enrollment in RCSBP enclosure (5). 3, Petitioner submitted a request to BCNR -e her RCSBP coverage with spousal concurrence, , 2010, Petitioner received her Notification of -er stated that she was eligible for a reserve she was also entitled to participate in RCSBP days to state whether she elected or declined sousal concurrence, enclosure (4). Effective “car if...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8385 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the previous Permanent Duty Station (PDS) rate based on a close proximity move. The Board concluded that the record should be changed to show Petitioner executed a written request to remove the Household Goods (SHG) funding...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8388 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with chis Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Funicios, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 duly 2014 and, pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8391-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2014. the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8398 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay (ISP) when he was discharged. 15 Apr 14 DRAB ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8399 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY ~~~ BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TUR ‘Docket No: 8399-13 27 January 2015 isted of your application, together with all Material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies, 2 June 1992, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on four occasions for two Specifications of assault, sleeping on post, absence from your appointed place of duty,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8403 13
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error OF injustice. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant vecharacterization of your husband’s discharge because of his repeated and lengthy periods of UA which resulted in three SPCMs, and since his conduct average was insufficiently hign to warrant a fully honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8410 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and: applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 25 September 1991, you began another period of UA that was not terminated until 28 January 1992, During the latter period of UA totalling 125 days, you were declared a deserter. Consequently, when applying - for a correction of an official -naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8412-13
‘A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, ' regulations, and policies. After careful and- conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence ‘submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8413 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. As you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice to assign a more favorable reentry code as an exception to policy, the Board was unable to recommend favorable action on your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8415 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of condition, not a disability, during initial training. : Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8418 13
A three- -member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration-of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material exror or injustice. After waiving your - procedural rights, your commanding: officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8424 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for spousal category of coverage prior to his retirement on 5 January 1985. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error “and injustice on 12 May 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8438 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8441 13
Furthermore, the Board concurred with the advisory opinion that you “may request to reenlist in the Marine Corps Reserve through: — -a Prior Service Recruiter provided you meet all the requirements . Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.