DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
a
Sa ike
FATT me
BAN
Docket No:NR08459-13
24 February 2014
From Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: - Secretary of the Navy
Subj
Ref {a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel (Ll) . DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2} Navy Personnel Command (NPC} memo 1430 Ser. 12/0023:
of
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board.requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-6 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve
advancement exam
2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 24 February 2014 and,: pursuant to its requlations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies
3 The Board, having reviewed ail the facts of record 4
pertaining to Petitioner’s. allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a Before ‘applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy
b In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request: has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following ~
corrective action.
‘RECOMMENDATION:
That ‘Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:
, : b - . :
a. .Petitioner was advanced to E-6/MA1 from the August 2010
Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam with an effective date of War
‘SEER with a Time In Rate date of QED.
NOTE: The change in the effective date of advancement to E-6 may
also impact on ‘Petitioner's E-7 advancement opportunities. If
Petitioner was eligible for, but did hot take an E-7 examination
because the above change had not yet been made, the following
procedures will apply to remediate that missed opportunity. ©
-.Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of
advancement to E-7 retroactive to the date Petitioner would neve
been first. eligible. A DD Form 149, a command
endorsement /recommendation, cycle profile sheets, a worksheet,
and a copy of this letter must be included with the request.
The Board will determine whether the request will be approved.
b. That a copy of this Report of proceedings be filed in
- Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c ) of the revised Brocsduvas of the:
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the. Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
mae J
ROBERT D, ZSALMAN OY I. MONTGOME
Recorder . Acting. Recorder
5 Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
24 February 2014
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6384-13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a} Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve “advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8582-13
requesting, in é¢ffect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8343-13
Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8947-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ZsSalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice _ on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined | that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. , Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have ' been first eligible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4193 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Time in Rate to E-5/MM2 be restored to March 2011 and that he was authorized to take the March 2014 E-6/JIM1 advancement examination. The Board, cons .sting of Ms. Davis, Ms. Wilcher and Mr. Grover reviewed Petitioner|s allegations of error and injustice on 15 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7626 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR735 14
_ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to IT2/E-5 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to...