DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket Na: NRO&578- 13
11 March 2014'
ne .
: 7 . wee
_ This is in reference to your. application for correction Of - your
naval record pursuant | to ‘the. provisions of 10 usc L5S20°
A three-member panel Of “the ‘Board for Correction of Naval
“Records, sitting in executive session, considered ‘your —.
application on 10 March ‘2014. Your allegations of error and -
injustice were. reviewed in accordance with administrative ©
“regulations. and’ procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in.
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
- regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered . the -
' advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel Command (NPC)
memo of 1780 PERS-312 of. 18 Feb (2014, a copy of which is being
provided to™ you. soa aes
‘Therefore, after careful’ and: conscientious consideration of the
entire record, the Board-found that the evidence submitted was.
insufficient. to. establish’ the existence of probable material
“ error or injustice... In. making this determination, the. Board’
‘substantially! conéurred: with the comments contained. in- the’. .
advisory opinion. which noted your service from (aD to, a
oe WE, which totals. four years. Therefore, your
'- application has been denied, since there is nothing“ to change. ~
- The namés and votes of the’ memperd. of the panel. will. be “
‘furnished. upon. ‘request.
sre, is regretted ‘that the circumstances ‘of your case. are such -
that favorable.action cannot. be: taken. You are entitled to’ have | at
the Board reconsider its: ‘decision - upon ‘submission of new-and
“.. material. evidence or other matter not. previously considered By
the Board. In this: regard, ‘it is also important to keep. in mind | "
that a presumption of: regularity: attaches to. all. official -
, records. Consequently; when applying for a correction ‘of an.
, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice. -
™ Sincerely,
= Rte SD, . vA —
ce _. ROBERT. D. a
Acting Executive Director”
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6824 13
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 5420 PERS-806 dated a a copy of which is attached. applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3859 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March-2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVSUP Letter 4050 Ser N42/067 dated (RP @ copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable Material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3764 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this cage. Docket No.NHRO3764-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an optical naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10592 14
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11369 14
The page 11 entry was not considered, as the attached e-mail dated 28 October 2014 from Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) shows that neither the entry nor your rebuttal appears in your Official Military Personnel File. A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its gecision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6782 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2014. On 14 March 1988, you were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct {commission of a serious offense).. You waived all of your procedural rights, including your right to an administrative discharge board (ADB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4099-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application’ on 26 March 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | NR12995 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materia submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your receipt of substantial disability ratings from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) effective the day following your discharge from the Navy was not considered probative of the existence of error or injustice in your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0478 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, In-addition, the Board considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB), dated 18 June 2013, a copy cof which is attached. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9789 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2014. evidence is'evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying ' for-a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.