NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8683 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. Nevertheless, the Board found that _ these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in four NJPs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8690 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 25 January 1989, the ADB found that you committed misconduct (commission of a serious offense) and recommended that you be separated with an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8693 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1901 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO8693-13 5 June 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: a Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he selected the Survivor Benefit Plan coverage for his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8699 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR870 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8701 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR871 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. A 3.0 conduct mark average was required for a fully honorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR872 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 28 October 1987, you received an honorable discharge due to convenience of the government (review action), and were issued an RE-4 (not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8736 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8742 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8745 13
NR8745-13 29 Apr 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ~ Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below ghould be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8749 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on: 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8761 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO8761-13 22 July 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he had over 20 years of active duty service and retired....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8781 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You then requested an under conditions other than honorable (OTH) discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court- martial for a 310 day period of UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8783 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIQ dated 18 March 2014, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8784 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 70% S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8798 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying - for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8801 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘ application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8814 13
B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8840 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an Docket No.NR08843-13 official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8859 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY > \A\ BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record reflect that he received the Navy Good Conduct Medal (NGCM) for his service from 5 March 1970 to 20 December 1974. The Board, consisting of Mr. Green, Mr. Spain, and Ms. White-Olson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8867-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NR08867-13 "42 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy , Subj: SALA een Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was transferred to the Fleet...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8869 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S$. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to add the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) to her enlistment guarantees. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 April 2014 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8871 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying’ for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8872 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board carefully considered all of the arguments raised in your application and the evidence your counsel submitted regarding those claims. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden ig on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8879 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8881 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8882 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, at the time of your service, a general discharge was routinely issued to service members discharged due to inaptitude.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8883 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8886 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. , New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board fprior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8887-13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,: together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, _ regulations and policies. The In its review of your application: the Board carefully weighed 7 -all potentially. when applying for a correction of an official naval record,’ the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable: material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8890 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8891 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You received restriction, extra duty and a forfeiture of pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8892 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, Suite 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204 JET Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to authorize reimbursement of a Household Goods (HHG) Move. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr. Ruskin, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8896 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8898 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2014. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8918 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8921 13
NR8921-13 te tates oe Te ee to your application for correction of your naval This is in referen 0 uSC 1552. . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8924 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8928 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 bIc Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of Involuntary Separation Pay {ISP} when he was discharged. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8929 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ‘Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8932 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when “applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8937 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8945 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8947-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ZsSalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice _ on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined | that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. , Petitioner may reapply to this Board for consideration of advancement to E-5 retroactive to the date Petitioner would have ' been first eligible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8951 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8954 13
| A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8955 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. service member. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of - probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8957 13
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary — (3) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the © JPD (alcohol rehabilitation failure) separation code and RE-3F (physical fitness assessment failure) reentry code issued on 31 August 2012 be upgraded. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Tew, and Ms. White-Olson,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8958 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...