Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8582-13
Original file (NR8582-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
' BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN
Docket No:NR08582-13
24 February 2014

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy ;
subj: eel
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552.

Encl: (1) . DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 812/0035

of

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed

enclosure (1) with this Board. requesting, in é¢ffect, that the

applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was.

advanced to E-6 from the February 2012 Navy- -wide Reserve
advancement exam.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval -
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed ail the facts of record

pertaining to Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner's application has’ commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION

- Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION ;

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, whére appropriate,
as follows:

a.- Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AD1 from the February
2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam with an effective date

of QP 5) 2 Time In Rate date of i

b.- That a copy.of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner's nayal record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal .
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is-a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Bb y " Dear |

ROBERT D. ASALMAN BRONTE I. MONTGOMERY

Recorder Acting Recorder
Bs Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) o£ the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the.
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy..

24 February 2014

Ree SG 9

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN |
“Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8343-13

    Original file (NR8343-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9104 13

    Original file (NR9104 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/PS2 from the March 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR735 14

    Original file (NR735 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 704 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enciosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to IT2/E-5 from the February 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and Ruskin reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 5 May 2014 and, pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8585 13

    Original file (NR8585 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5/MM2 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2014 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14

    Original file (NR0322 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8640 13

    Original file (NR8640 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    _ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 $, COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No:NROQ8640-13 11 March 2014 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: iia? Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-4/STS3 from the March 2011 Navy-wide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8459-13

    Original file (NR8459-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board.requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the August 2010 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and,: pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR614 14

    Original file (NR614 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to LS1/E6 from the August 2012 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2740 14

    Original file (NR2740 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 21 July 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13

    Original file (NR9380 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...