NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11037-08
As a result of that rating action, your case was referred to the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery for review. After being advised of the options available.to you, you elected to request transfer to the Retired List of the Marine Corps Reserve with entitlement to retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11040-08
The TEMADD orders further directed that she was to e-mail IAHHG@navy.mil for instructions if she had household goods (HHG) to move or to be placed in storage. time between the orders and the proceed date was fairly short, the orders were in support of a contingency operation, making arrangements for such an assignment in so short a time period is complex, and the cost of providing the relief is low as compared to the government cost for moving and Docket No. Accordingly, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11043-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to retroactive Physician Board Certified Pay (BCP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11048-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11049-08
A three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11052-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 11052-08 14 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11054-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on $ June 2009. After review, the separation authority directed an honorable discharge due te parenthood or custody of minor children: and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment .code.-.You--« were so discharged on 13 September 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11055-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11058-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11059-08
OR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your: application on 29 September 2009. considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 18 September 1975, the convening authority approved the sentence, but suspended tlw execution of the BCD for six months.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11063-08
11063-08 12 May 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.8$.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11076-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 11076-08 21 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy ae ted Sub}: FORMER in REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner requests further consideration of his request for correction of his record to show that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11086-08
This is in referen naval record pursu United States Code A three-member pan Records, sitting i application on 3 March 2009. injustice were rev regulations and pr Board. 1 of the Board for Correction of Naval executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and Lhewed in accordance with administrative pcedures applicable to the proceedings of this y evidence considered by the Board consisted h, together with all material submitted in bur naval record and applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11088-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, LyQaas W. DEAN PFE Pxecutive Dareator Enclosure wEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11089-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 30 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11102-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11108-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting. Documentary material considered by the Board corisisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when supplying for a correction of an official neval_ record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11109-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH — : Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR) .° 2. b. Petitioner has completed the first phase of his Nuclear Field training and is entitled to 33...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11111-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11119-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11121-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11122-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and you received an undesirable discharge on 2 December 1978. The Board found those factors insufficient to warrant corrective action in your case, given the lengthy period of your unauthorized absence.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11135-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY : BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. 11135-08 7 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Si aa REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11136-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(TAR) vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Ruskin, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 January...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11141-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11142-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11156-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11156-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2009. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your rank by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or aggravated by your naval service, the Board was unable to recommend favorable action on your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11165-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your. The Board noted that on 2 September 1993, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you disability ratings for residuals of a knee injury that occurred in 1973, and hearing loss that was noted in 1973. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11167-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11171-08
Your request to change flight status was not considered, as it is the policy of the Board for Correction of Naval Records not to entertain such requests. The Board was likewise unable to find that your loss of situational awareness was insufficient to support the decision to assign you B(2) status. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11175-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 October 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11178-08
application on 14 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned on more than one oecasion, that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11183-08
»1 of the Board for Correction of Naval h executive session, considered your rxch 2009. material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11187-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by setting-aside the nonjudicial punishment imposed on 12 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11189-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11191-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 14 October 2009. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when an individual is released at the expiration of his term of active obligated service and is not recommended for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11194-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You waived your rights to consult counsel, submit a statement or have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB) .- On 9 October 1992, your commanding officer forwarded his recommendation that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11197-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11203-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. You were discharged by reason of misconduct-minor disciplinary infractions on 1 September 1983 with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11207-08
RTS DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 cS LCC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. t nar ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, III Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11212-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11215-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11216-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11218-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, ‘considered your application on 14 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in: Support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. Commandant for Aviation (DCA) decision te decision to take more severe administrative action against you than that recommended by the FFPB and FSSB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11226-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navai Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11228-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was promoted to E5/SGT with a date of rank and effective date of 1 May 1999 vice 1 September 1999. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11237-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11243-08
A three-member panei of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2009. As a result of your frequent acts of misconduct your commanding officer recommended that you be administratively separated with an other than honorable discharge {OTH). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11246-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...