DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORRS
2 NAVY ANNEX Docket No: 11055-08
WASHINGTON DOC 20370-5106
15 June 2009
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Cede section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 June 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicabie to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. :
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 20 August 2008.
On 22 August 2008 you underwent a psychological evaluation and —
were found to have diagnoses of a history of depressive disorder
and personality disorder with borderline features. On il
September 2008 you received an entry level separation by reason
of erroneous entry and were assigned a reentry code of
RE-4.
The Board noted that a reentry code of RE-4, while not required,
is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to
service members separated by reason of erroneous entry especially
in cases such as yours where the enlistment is deemed erroneous
because of a disqualifying psychiatric condition.
‘The Board was not persuaded that it would be in the interest of
justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. .The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it igs important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Rk BS a
ForeW. DEAN P FFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02865-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. he Board was not persuaded however, that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00217-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That code is often assigned in cases such as yours, where the enlistment is deemed erroneous because of previously undiagnosed, disqualifying psychological conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04108-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board was not persuaded, however, that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09137-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11189-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11089-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 30 September 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07997-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01058-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that your reentry code was assigned in error, or that it is unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01850-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that a reentry code of RE-4, while not required, may be assigned to Sailors discharged by reason of erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00188-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That code is often assigned in cases such as yours, where the enlistment is deemed erroneous because of previously undiagnosed, disqualifying...