2 PARTMENT OF brik Navy
"BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDE
2 NAVY ANBIEX
WASHINGTON DG BUS YO-S1On .
CRS
Dockat No: 11108-08
1 Ocbob sr 2003
a oree
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
‘naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting. in executive. session, considered your . -
application on 30 September 20098.. Your allegations of error ena,
injustice were reviewed in’ accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board corisisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you served in the Navy Reserve from 24
November 2003 to 26 February 2005, when you were discharged by
reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a general discharge.
You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as required by
governing directives.
As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy,
there is no basis for granting your request. . Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you
have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to
the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may do so by
submitting the attached DD Form 293 -to the NDRB.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action comrot be taken. You «eve entitled to hove the
Hoard reconsider its decision woon submission of mew and nateris!
evidence ar other matter i
not vreviously congicured “yy the Board.
In this regard, it is importani to keep ia mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when supplying for a correction of an official neval_
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
vo
Duh
Executive Dir
Enclosure.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00025-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01927-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02452-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05413-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRSDocket No: 5413-07 28 February 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.Athree memberpanelof the Boardfor Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08216-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O37O-5 100CRSDocket No: 8216-07 20 March 2008This isin reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code section 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12102-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03000-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07135-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10587-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 1 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07122-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.