This is in referen
naval record pursu
United States Code
A three-member pan
Records, sitting i
application on 3 March 2009.
injustice were rev
regulations and pr
Board. Documentar
of your applicatio
support thereof, y
regulations and po
advisory opinion,
November 2008, ac
After careful and
record, the Board
insufficient to es
error or injustice}.
concurred with the
Accordingly, your
votes of the membe
request.
It is regretted th
that favorable act
the Board reconsid
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
er
RDZ:ecb
Docket No. 11086-08
4 March 2009
re to your application for correction of your
ant to the provisions of title 10 of the
section 1552.
1 of the Board for Correction of Naval
executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
Lhewed in accordance with administrative
pcedures applicable to the proceedings of this
y evidence considered by the Board consisted
h, together with all material submitted in
bur naval record and applicable statutes,
licies. In addition, the Board considered the
from Headquarters, Marine Corps dated 7
opy of which is attached.
f
conscientious consideration of the entire.
Found that the evidence submitted was
tablish the existence of probable material
In this connection, the Board substantially
comments contained in the advisory opinion.
application has been denied. The names and
rs of the panel will be furnished upon
at the circumstances of your case are such
Lon cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
er its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Enclosure
Sincerely,
W.' DEAN P
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11183-08
»1 of the Board for Correction of Naval h executive session, considered your rxch 2009. material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10504-08
E DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 RDZ:ecb Docket No. Your allegations of error and Lewed in accordance with administrative ocedures applicable to the proceedings of this lY evidence considered by the Board consisted nm, together with all material submitted in our naval record and applicable statutes, licies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10386-08
concurred with the Accordingly, your votes of the membe request. Your allegations of error and Zewed in accordance with administrative locedures applicable to the proceedings of this lY evidence considered by the Board consisted In, together with all material submitted in our naval record and applicable statutes, licies. Consequently, when|applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06470-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, application on 26 injustice were re regulations and p Board. Your allegations of error and 1ewed in accordance with administrative ocedures applicable to the proceedings of this y material considered by the Board consisted n, together with all material submitted in our naval record and applicable statutes, licies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05202-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26/ February 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 2 July 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00885-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion provided by the Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 22 January 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04366-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 17 June 2009 with enclosure and the Navy Personnel Command dated 26 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06507-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2009. On 28 March 1991 you received your fourth NJP for three periods of failure to,go to your appointed place of duty and were awarded a $800 forfeiture of pay, restriction for 30 days, and reduction to paygrade E-2. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09992-09
7 ae A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...