Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11076-08
Original file (11076-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS

Docket No: 11076-08
21 January 2009

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: secretary of the Navy

  
    

  
  

ae ted

  

Sub}: FORMER in

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD

 

 

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner
requests further consideration of his request for correction of
his record to show that he received a more favorable reentry code
than RE-4.

  
   

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01601-09

    Original file (01601-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr =i DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS Docket No: 1601-09 8 September 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER Qi OF NAVAL RECORD . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 19 May 2005. as ieee, and Ms. RB reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06951-00

    Original file (06951-00.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code be changed. The petty officer filled out some paperwork for him to see a psychiatrist and told him to tell the psychiatrist that he was depressed and suicidal, and had attempted suicide at an early age. MAJORITY RECOMMENDATION: a.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08162-00

    Original file (08162-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 28 December 1999. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this 2. chancel' since he says that he was told that he could He requests a f. With his application, Petitioner has submitted a statement from a recruiter with whom he is now working, who points out that at the time of Petitioner's separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08650-00

    Original file (08650-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting, in effect, by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 25 September 2000. that his naval record be corrected filed enclosure (1) with this McPartlin, and Ms. 2. September 2000, the recruit division commander also recommended By letter of 7 in retention, citing his demonstration of Commitment.W lloutstanding job on his duties," and his '@the Navy core values of Honor,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06751-00

    Original file (06751-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    C. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 31 August 1991 for six years as an EN3 (E-4). MAJORITY CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the majority, consisting of Messrs. Lightle and Geisler, concludes In this that Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. MINORITY CONCLUSION: The minority member, Mr. Taylor, agrees with Petitioner's request should be granted by changing his reenlistment code from RE-4 to RE-6.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12993-10

    Original file (12993-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 18 July 2008. 2, The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Garst, and Mr. Grover, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 20 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09103-07

    Original file (09103-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 09103-07 21 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF aq See Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00144-09

    Original file (00144-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 22 January 2008. The Board, consisting of Ms. 4 eee vs. mmmmingss 208 Mr. Willie cov iewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Accordingly, the Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06600-00

    Original file (06600-00.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 31 August. In this regard, the majority notes that his conduct mark average was sufficient for an honorable discharge, despite his four disciplinary actions. MINORITY CONCLUSION: Mr. Beckett disagrees with the majority and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1360 13

    Original file (NR1360 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Enclosure (2) h. On 23 August 2004 Petitioner was so discharged. wa The majority of the Board also relies upon the advisory opinion from the Marine Corps Judge Advocate Division which recommended an upgrade to Petitioner's reenlistment code; removal of all adverse material in Petitioner's Official Military Personnel File pertaining to administrative separation ror misconduct due to drug abuse; and that all associated relief be granted. The minority notes that Petitioner was found guilty...