NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00662-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve and to the Retired List vice being discharged on 5 December 1989. However, the Board is aware that the Navy Personnel Command has routinely recommended corrective action when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and the individual did not realize...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00667-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Subsequently, on 22 November 1999 you were discharged with an entry level separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00668-08
Sincerely, Enclosure 5420 OPNAV N135 05 Mar 08 From: Ms. Heather L. Pouncey, Physical Readiness Program Manager (OPNAV N135) To: Heather Topping, Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-31C) Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF Ref: (a) OPNAVINST 6110.1H (b) BCNR Case File 00668-08 Encl: (1) PRIMS Record (NAVPERSCOM Official data) 1. Sailor petitioned the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) in accordance with reference (a), to correct errors and/or remove...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00682-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00687-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00690-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. The BCD was subsequently suspended for six months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00692-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00693-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for further service by reason of physical disability that was incurred in or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00696-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00698-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00702-08
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dietrich, J. Hicks and Pfeiffer, reviewed allegations of error and injustice on 6 November 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that relief should be granted. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the three service record page 11(d) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entries dated 28 September 2006. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00704-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00707-08
The recommendation for discharge was approved by the separation authority, who directed that you be discharged by reason of misconduct/commission of a serious offense, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The Board did not consider whether your discharge should be upgraded to general or honorable since you have not exhausted an available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00709-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00710-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00712-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 9 April 1964, you were returned to military authorities after being in a UA status for about 120 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00716-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00719-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 16 July 1987, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse determined by a unit...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00723-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. In addition, the Board considered the shed by the Navy Personnel Command dated of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the butden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00725-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval -Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations ' and policies.. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00726-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No. In addition, you presented no evidence which suggests that you were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your rank on the date of your release from active duty. Absent such additional evidence, further review of your application is not possible.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00730-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2009. Shortly after serving a period of four months of confinement at hard labor you began another period of UA that lasted nearly 50 days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00734-08
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00735-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00746-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2008. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 7 August 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00748-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 8 November 2007. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 5 September 2007. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of either an RE-3E or RE-4 reentry code to an individual separated for erroneous entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00772-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00782-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 November 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00793-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 March 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00796-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00805-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. Finally, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required when a Sailor, serving in paygrade E-2, is not recommended for reenlistment because of unsatisfactory performance. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00806-08
806-08 24 Mar 08This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00807-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00810-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of one-half separation pay when discharged from the Marine Corps on 28 September 2007.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00824-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of Enlistment Bonus (EB) for the SEAL Challenge Program. - | IL ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS, ITI Recorder Acting Recorder a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00838-08
838-08 17 Mar 08From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00840-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD:hd Docket No. 00840-08 29 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00858-08
858-08 17 Mar 08 DearThis is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00870-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00874-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 May to 16 Jul 2006 and all related correspondence, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Dietrich and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 31 January 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00877-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00885-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion provided by the Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards dated 22 January 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00887-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2008. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00888-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Cor, ection of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient injustice. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00889-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Nevertheless, these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of your repetitive and lengthy periods of UA which resulted in two court-martial convictions, anda period of UA for which you did not receive disciplinary action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00904-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00911-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant changes to your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your diagnosed personality disorder and nonrecommendation for retention or reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00912-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00916-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00917-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 5 December 1975 an ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to conviction by civil authorities.