Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00662-08
Original file (00662-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG

Docket No: 662-08
16 December 2008

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
LO% Secretary of the Navy

 

 

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ‘didi a

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this
Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show
that he transferred to the Retired Reserve and to the Retired
List vice being discharged on 5 December 1989.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. WM Ms. S00muBEOmand Ms.
wy oceviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 9 December 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and

applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that Petitioner's application was
not filed in a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to
waive the statute of limitations and consider the application on
its merits.

c. Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy Reserve for six years
on 6 February 1983 in the rate of petty officer first class (HT1;
E-6). At the end of his anniversary year on 27 February 1989 he

completed 20 years of qualifying service for reserve retirement.
Apparently, about this time he transferied to the Individual
Ready Reserve (IRR) and had no further participation in the Navy
Reserve. Although there are conflicting dates of discharge in
the record, it appears that since there is no extension ii the
record, he was honorably discharged on 5 February 1989, at the
expiration of his 6 February 1983 enlistment. He became 60 years
of age on 24 May 2004 and is receiving his retired pay as a
former member.

d. The Board did not request an advisory opinion in this
case. However, the Board is aware that the Navy Personnel
Command has routinely recommended corrective action when an
individual is qualified for reserve retirement and the individual
did not realize that transfer to the Retired Reserve must be
requested prior to discharge.

e. The Uniform Retirement Date Act, 5 U.S.C. 8301, requires
that the effective date of any retirement be the first day of the
month.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. Petitioner was in good standing in the Navy Reserve and
would have been retired if he had requested it in sufficient time
prior to the expiration of his enlistment. Therefore, the Board
concludes that Petitioner's record should be corrected to show
that he transferred to the Retired Reserve in the rate of HT1.
Given the requirements of the Uniform Retirement Date Act, the
retirement should be effective on 1 February 1989 vice the
discharge of 5 February 1989 or any other date in 1989 now of
record. Since he is 60 years old, the record should be further
corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired List on 24
May 2004, his 60th birthday.

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand his status in the Retired Reserve.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
transferred to the Retired Reserve effective on 1 February 1989,
in the grade of HT1 vice the discharge of 5 February 1989 or any
other date now of record. His record should then be corrected to
show that he transferred to the Retired List on 24 May 2004, his
60th birthday.

b. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN Gem |: Aeogh GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the

authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

a

   
 

DEAN P
Buceutcive

 

tor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08222-08

    Original file (08222-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 8222-08 4 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW ” NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06697-07

    Original file (06697-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve and to ¶he Retired List vice being discharged.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. ~ ~ MrJ~ and Ms. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error andinjustice on 8 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05273-08

    Original file (05273-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 5273-08 2 July 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF ‘iil Ref: (a) Title 10 U.s.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01204-09

    Original file (01204-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve and to the Retired List vice being discharged on 6 July 1991. He was then yonorably discharged at the expiration of his enlistment on 6 July 1991. d. It is clear that since Petitioner did not earn any qualifying years after 6 December 1989 that he did...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05444-08

    Original file (05444-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner, a , filed an application that his record be 2. That Petitioner record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve effective on 1 August 2004, in the grade of GySgt vice the discharge of 13 August 2004 now of record. c. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06500-02

    Original file (06500-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was credited with three years of reserve service not shown on his statement of service, that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 9 August 1990, and transferred to the Retired...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00758-03

    Original file (00758-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged. He became 60 years old on 26 March 1989 and has been receiving his retired pay as a "former member" since then. d. At enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from the Navy Personnel Command (Pers 911), recommending that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07777-07

    Original file (07777-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 7777-07 22 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08021-08

    Original file (08021-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 . TRG Docket No: 8021-08 6 May 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1} Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07451-00

    Original file (07451-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record - Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 14 July 1994. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...