Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00692-08
Original file (00692-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX >
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

BAN
Docket No. 00692-08
8 December 2008

 

Dear (RRR WIIPraee::.

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on

8 December 2008. Your allegations cf error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel
Command {NPC) memo 1430 Ser 812 of 14 Apr 08, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a
majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with
the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is alsce important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material

error or injustice.

W. DEAN PFETFFER \\
Executive Directo

     

Enclosure

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10121-08

    Original file (10121-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2008. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes; regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03066-08

    Original file (03066-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden: is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07921-08

    Original file (07921-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02440-08

    Original file (02440-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, — regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10713-08

    Original file (10713-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ail material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 8 December 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09105-08

    Original file (09105-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 6 August 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08354-08

    Original file (08354-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11016-08

    Original file (11016-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with alli material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 11 December 2008 with enclosures and 24 December 2008, copies of - which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06399-07

    Original file (06399-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CMC memorandums 1920 MMSR-3 of 16 May 2008 and 1050 MPO-40 -of 8 August 2008, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02121-08

    Original file (02121-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/304 of 8 Apr 08. The petitioner is requesting retroactive advancement to E6 and E7 and advancement to E8 based on awards not recorded on DD Form 214. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.