Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00726-08
Original file (00726-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

JRE
Docket No. 00726-08
19 September 2008

 

 

ein p , a

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 September 2008. After careful consideration
of your application, the Board concluded that your application
was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest
of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application in
a timely manner. In this regard, it concluded that you knew on 3
March 1986 that you had not been given a diagnosis of
posttraumatic stress disorder, and that you were being released
from active duty for a reason other than physical disability.
In addition, you presented no evidence which suggests that you
were unfit to reasonably perform the duties of your rank on the
date of your release from active duty.

You may request reconsideration of this decision. Your request
must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not
reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.

The evidence may pertain to the timeliness of your application
or to its merits. Absent such additional evidence, further
review of your application is not possible.
It is regretted that a more favorable reply cannot be made.
Sincerely,
KP To

ROBERT D\_JZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08398-07

    Original file (08398-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03908-07

    Original file (03908-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    03908-07 27 May 2008This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2008. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04052-07

    Original file (04052-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2008. The Board concluded that you reenlisted in the USMCR on 17 January 2003, rather than the USMC, and that you did not have the right to be retained on active duty beyond 16 October 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00290-10

    Original file (00290-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 October 2010. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were not physically qualified for release from active duty on 2 October 2008, or that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 27 May 2009, when you were discharged by reason of physical fitness assessment failure, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11203-08

    Original file (11203-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. You were discharged by reason of misconduct-minor disciplinary infractions on 1 September 1983 with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11481-08

    Original file (11481-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2008. Also, at that time, there was an undesirable social stigma associated with people who endure a hearing loss, so I didn’t pursue this disability with the Veterans Administration”. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11013-08

    Original file (11013-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2008. The Board concluded that the available records are insufficient to demonstrate that you were unfit for duty on 18 September 1968 due to a mental disorder was incurred in or aggravated by your service on active duty for training in the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07798-07

    Original file (07798-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, on 15 October 1984, you received an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10732-07

    Original file (10732-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your request was approved by the discharge authority, and on 3 May 1977, you were issued a DD Form 794, Certificate of Discharge Under Other than...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07481-07

    Original file (07481-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...