Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00874-08
Original file (00874-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

HD:hd
Docket No. 00874-08

31 January 2008

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

   

To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj 7 2 een aS en ee ee ee
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 4 Oct 06 w/attachments
(2) BCNR ltr dtd 7 Jun 07
(3) NAVIG rept of investigation in Subject's case
(4) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 May to
16 Jul 2006 and all related correspondence, a copy of which is

at Tab A. By enclosure (2), his case was administratively
closed because he then had several investigations ongoing. On
receipt of enclosure (3), his case was administratively
reopened.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bowen, Dietrich and Morgan,

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
31 January 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,

finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (3), the Office of the Naval Inspector
General commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request has
merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (3), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following

corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following fitness report and related material:

Period of Report
Date of Report Reporting Senior From To

13Ju106 Kr USN iMay06 16Ju106

 

b. That there be inserted in Petitioner's naval record a
memorandum in place of the removed report containing appropriate
identifying data concerning the report; that the memorandum
state that the report has been removed by order of the Secretary
of the Navy in accordance with the provisions of federal law and
may not be made available to selection boards and other
reviewing authorities; and that such boards may not conjecture
or draw any inference as to the nature of the report.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.
4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter.

Asnnthin) d foveben

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08771-08

    Original file (08771-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 November 2007 to 16 May 2008 and all related material, a copy of which is at Tab A. d. In enclosure (3), the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations also recommended removing the reference to a pending DFC, but added a recommendation to remove...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10352-09

    Original file (10352-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 16 Sep 09 w/attachment (2) PERS-32 memo dtd 22 Oct 09 i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 February to 20 August 2008 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Leeman and Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12156-09

    Original file (12156-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner further requested completely removing the fitness report for 6 August 2007 to 30 June 2008. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's request to strike his failures of selection by the FY 2007-2010 AR Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action. e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04627-10

    Original file (04627-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 2007 to 2 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. Petitioner further requested removing the service record page llc (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 5 February and 4 March 2008. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05932-07

    Original file (05932-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for1 February to 20 March 2006 and related material, a copy of which is at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Boyd and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 January 2008, and pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06201-08

    Original file (06201-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    “Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness reports for 22 February to 30 June 2002, 1 July to 9 December 2002 and 10 December 2002 to 30 March 2003, and filing in their place revised reports for the same periods. In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HOMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01229-09

    Original file (01229-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures (except enclosure (2)), naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board finds Petitioner’s FY 2009 and 2010 failures should be removed as well, since the marks cited above were in his record for both of the promotion boards concerned, and removing all failures is necessary to restore Petitioner to the status he enjoyed, before the FY 2008 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, as an officer who...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11081 14

    Original file (NR11081 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference ta), Subject, nereinafter referred to as petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the appticable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 July to 13 December 2008 (copy at Tab A). ee reviewed petitioner's allegations of error ang injustice on 12 February 2025, and pursuant to its regulations, detezmined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12104-08

    Original file (12104-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 16 September 2007 to 12 May 2008, a copy of which is at Tab A. By enclosure (3), Petitioner requested reconsideration, specifically requesting modification of the report by removing, from block 41 (“Comments on Performance”), reference to the revocation of his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02822-09

    Original file (02822-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 18 December 2007 to 31 October 2008 (copy at Tab A) by deleting all marks, averages, recommendations and comments from blocks 33-43 and 45 and all statements and attachments. d. The contested fitness report shows Petitioner was the executive officer (XO) aboard...