NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00036-05
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 March 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 20 October 2004 Petitioner executed the appropriate documents whereby he voluntarily elected to participate in the DITY Program to move his personal property; that by endorsement dated 20 October 2004 authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00046-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. As requested by reference (a), Mr. petition for award of the Vietnam Service Medal has been reviewed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00073-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00212-05
The member requests the removal of his fitness report for the period 1 November 2003 to 13 August 2004.2. d. The reporting senior is charged with commenting on the performance or characteristics of each member under his/her command and determines what material will be included in a fitness report. Each fitness report represents the judgment of the reporting senior during a particular reporting period.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00306-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 October 2005. The Board noted that you were severely disabled when the Physical Evaluation Board (PEE) considered your case on 17 December 1998, and recommended that you be permanently retired with a disability rating of 100%. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00337-05
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00340-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Agresti, Mr. Dawson, and Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 March 2005 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00375-05
A three-memler panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 March 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00431-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 23 July 1984 after more than seven years of prior honorable service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00451-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. In order to receive an RE-3R reenlistment code, a Sailor must be recommended for advancement or be promotable. Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s record does not warrant the worst reenlistment code of RE-4, and that code should be changed to RE-3R.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00471-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus College Credit (EBCC) entitlement.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Shy and Wade reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00475-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2005. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 19 July 2002 you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00506-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 March 1993, while serving in paygrade E-2, you were honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Naval Reserve.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00514-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 6 March 1980 at age 20 and served without disciplinary incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00553-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00558-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, you subsequently waived your right to present your case to an ADB in exchange for a recommendation for a general discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00562-05
On 17 December 2004 the discharge authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to alcohol abuse. On 22 December 2004 you were so separated from the Navy, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00573-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Shy and Wade reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00576-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00578-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00579-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00585-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 February 1979 at age 18. After your fourth nonjudicial punishment,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00588-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your late husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00592-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00598-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and assertion that you should have been assigned an RE-i reenlistment code because you were honorably discharged upon completion of your required service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00601-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00605-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00608-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00610-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00626-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 626-05 24 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Shortly after the conviction by SPCM, on 31 July 1960, Petitioner received adverse marks of 1.0 and 3.4 in conduct and proficiency, respectively. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00631-05
631—05 23 March 2005Dear ~This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00639-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00663-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00674-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability and assigned a reentry code of RE-3, vice under honorable conditions by reason of a condition, not a disability, interfering with his performance of duty, with a general discharge and a reentry code of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00717-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he meets the criteria for special leave accrual.2. 717-05 CONCLUS IONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00827-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Agresti, Mr. Dawson, and Ms. Hurnberd, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 March 2005 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00847-05
1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00878-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOAD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Leeman, Pfeiffer, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00884-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of one-half separation pay when he was discharged from active duty.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Chapman, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 March 2005 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00888-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRGDocket No: 888-0516 March 2005From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF OS2~UhIIIEhIIhIhhUIuI~ USN,Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that documentation showing a one day period of unauthorized...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00899-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. 4IUU~U~~I~entered the Navy through the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 12 January 2004 and volunteered for the Nuclear Field (NF) Open Program Guarantee with a $10,000 Enlistment Bonus (EB) . He was not guaranteed an EBCC.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00910-05
A three-merniber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were in a UA status again from 7 April to 8 May 1973 and as a result on 30 May 1973 you received nonjudicial punishment for a 31 day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00999-05
It rejected the unsubstantiated opinion of your forensic psychiatrist that you lacked mental responsibility when you committed the offense that resulted in your discharge, as well as when you requested discharge in lieu of trial by general court-martial for desertion and disobedience of an order.The Board did not concur with the conclusion of the designees of the Specialty Leader for Psychiatry that your mental disorder was aggravated by your naval service. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01000-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/079 of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01026-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 8 June 1979 at age 18. You waived your rights to consult counsel,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01045-05
1045-0530 August 2005This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01115-05
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted USNR(TAR), vice USN. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01159-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You were commissioned in the Naval Reserve on 3 February 1988 and began an uninterrupted period of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01177-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2005. You were so discharged on 28 July 1953. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01231-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were commissioned a second lieutenant in the Marine Corps Reserve on 27 May 1953. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.