DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SRB
Docket No. 899-05
23 March 2005
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code,
section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting
in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. Your
allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with
administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In
addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO
memorandum N13OD1/05u0158 dated 7 March 2005, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the
Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory
opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or
other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 2O3~O-2O00
IN REPLY REFER TO
5420
N13001/05U0158
7 Mar 05
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF
Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00899-05 with CD service record
1. N130 recommends disapproval ~ petition for an Enlistment Bonus
for College Credit (EBCC)
2. 4IUU~U~~I~entered the Navy through the Delayed Entry
Program (DEP) on 12 January 2004 and volunteered for the Nuclear
Field (NF) Open Program Guarantee with a $10,000 Enlistment
Bonus (EB) . He shipped to active duty on 20 October 2004. In
his petition, ~ requests payment of an EBCC.
3. The purpose of the EBCC program is to increase the number of
enlistments of personnel with prior college level education. This
program is not an entitlement and is subject to annual budget
constraints. The EBCC is guaranteed only at the discretion of the
classifiers and is not offered to every recruit.
4. The enlistment/reenlistment document (DO Form 4) is the official
document used to identify enlistment guarantees. A review of
4UUUJIIBIUIIgUII Annex A to his DD Form 4 reveals that he was
guaranteed the Nuclear Field (NF) Pro9ram and a $10,000 EB. He was not
guaranteed an EBCC. ~ signed the DD Form 4 acknowledging that no
guarantee was made to him other than those listed on his Record of
Military Processing (DD Form 1966), his DD Form 4 and its Annexes. He
is therefore not entitled to receive an EBCC.
5. BCNR case file with CD service record is returned herewith as
enclosure (1)
Enlisted Bonus Programs
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 08523-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2005. UUUUIUIhIh~ entered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 08 August 2001, volunteered for the NUCLEAR FIELD PROGRAM guarantee and signed a contract for an $8,000 Enlistment Bonus (EB) and a $3,000 EBCC. Review of iIUIqMhin~flfhIII~I case file shows she did not complete her Nuclear Field training and is therefore not entitled to an EBCC.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05882-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/06U066l of 10 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08825-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0057 of 23 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient td...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10506-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0227 of 12 Mar 07, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11000-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0l48 of 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09649-04
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following provides comment and recommendation on petition.2. In accordance with reference (a) EB entitlement for members enrolled in the CASH program will be based on the date the member reports to RTC and the EB message in effect at the time of DEP enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00419-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/07U0l54 OF 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04635-04
A review of Annex A to DD Form 4 reveals that he was not guaranteed an EBCC. He is therefore not entitled to receive an EBCC. Per enclosure (1) and reference (a), Applicants with college level foreign education who have satisfactorily completed the U.S. equivalent of 45 semester hours at a college or university accredited for post secondary education, may be enlisted as an in paygrade E-3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07869-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYOFFiCE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 2000 NAVY PENTAGON WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02693-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR), and Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 March 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations,...