NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05603-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05604-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, your request for discharge was granted The Board also you would not have committed However, the Board The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully considered all mitigating factors, such as your youth and immaturity and post service conduct. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05606-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05607-01
in the report of the PERB in finding that the contested fitness report should stand. VIRGINIA 221 34-51 0 Y 3 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1610 MMER,'PERB 2001 1 JUL 3 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF SERGEA SMC (a) Sergeant (b) MC0 P1610.7E s DD Form 149 of 1 May 01 Per MC0 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, 1. with three...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05608-01
At the time of the NJP at issue, he was d. The clinic log shows that on 10 February 2001 Petitioner reported for duty at 0805 with an odor of alcohol, and that a DR M would perform a competence for duty examination. Accordingly, the majority concludes that the NJP and the related performance evaluation should be removed from Petitioner's record. Petitioner was incapacitated for duty as alleged, and the NJP should not be removed from his record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05609-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05612-02
(CWOS) Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation 2. directed that your naval record will be corrected by removing therefrom the Reviewin Officer's Certification only for the l_-- following fitness report: the Performance Evaluation Review Board error and injustice in your naval Having reviewed all the facts of record, the Board has -~- - - Rprt Date of -.-~^__---_ ____ Reporting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05617-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you were deemed to be financially irresponsible, the Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05618-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05622-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. enlistment contract required you to participate in 48 drills and perform 14 days of active duty for training (ACDUTRA) each year. Accordingly, your application The names and votes of the members of the panel An individual separated with such a The Board did not consider whether your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05626-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 July determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05632-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), reco.mmend the BCNR not correct lrecord to reflect that he terminated participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan 30 May 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05636-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05637-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative .regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05642-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At that time Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when there is a determination...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05650-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that on 26 April 1984 you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for an unauthorized absence of 121 days. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05661-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 4 Septkmber 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05663-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2002. persuaded that any additional conditions should have been rated by the PEB, or that the I, respectively, and you were transferred to the The 40% rating was confirmed by the PEB on 22 acromioclavicular separation repair; S/P abdominal sacrum lateral mass fusion; S/P posterior later The Board was not combined rating you received was erroneous or unjust. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05664-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Enlistment Bonus (EB) entitlement.. Messrs.‘Leeman, Suiter, and Ms. Beckett, reviewed 2. The Board, consisting of Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05667-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. 3 petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05668-01
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, regulations and policies. VIRGINIA 22 134-6 103 S TO: IN REPLY.REFER 1650 MMMA-3 llDecO1 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECT1 NAVAL RECORDS 3R, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF (BCNR) Subj: REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION FORMER MARINE Upon review of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05672-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Brezna, Mr. Milner, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 April determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05676-02
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC memorandum of 8 August 2002 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). e. In September 1996 the Defense Finance and Accounting Service...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05683-01
The punishment imposed was a punitive letter On 20 April 1993 you Since then On 7 August 1996 the Board considered and denied your request for removal of the NJP and punitive letter. commanding officer (CO) that imposed the NJP submitted a letter stating that he did not remember the particulars of the NJP and The CO also stated no longer had access to the NJP evidence. The Board concluded at that time At that time, the Your case was reconsidered based on a letter from the CO who imposed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05687-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record shows that during 1984 you received The court sentenced you to reduction to pay grade E.-l, A special court-martial convened on 7 January 1987 and convicted you of two periods of unauthorized absence totaling...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05687-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the SH rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agresti, Beckett, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05689-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05690-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05691-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05696-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that when Petitioner entered active duty he was given a thirty-six (36) month active duty service obligation. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05700-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner enrolled in the Family Dental Plan, Single option versus the Family option. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05701-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show reinstatement in the Naval Reserve so that he can qualify for reserve retirement. He earned no further qualifying years and was honorably discharged on 31 August 2000. d. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Director, Naval Reserve Administration Division, Navy...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05703-00
e. SF 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 30 July 97, Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital Oak Harbor, documenting on Axis I: Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Dysthymia, and on Axis II: Dependent and Avoidant Traits 3. Review of the service record revealed: entered the service on 18 August 94 in Portland, Oregon. There is no evidence of a mental illness present at the time of separation that rendered the service member disabled or unlit for increased risk of suicide...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05703-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 5703-02 17 September 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05704-02
Headquarters Marine Corps office request has commented to the effect CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. application with the supporting document MC0 P1070.12H, (IRAM), Marine Corps Individual Records Administration authorizes commanders to make Service Record Book 2. These page 11 entries meet the elements of a proper page 11 entry per paragraph required when a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05707-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2003. You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for three months, a $1,200 forfeiture of pay, reduction to paygrade E-1, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05708-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, Board requesting in effect, that the DD Form 214 and associated service record pages be corrected to show her current name and sex. or any other parts of the correction to Petitioner's DD Form 214, service record, would be inappropriate since those records correctly show that a man named Robert B. Streeter served in the Navy from 5 March 1984 to 4 March 1988. That a copy of the foregoing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05714-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his retired pay was based on 25 years, 6 months, and 3 days military service. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and McBride, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 17 December 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05715-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The PEB determined that you were fit for duty, notwithstanding those diagnoses, and the Chief of Naval Personnel was requested to take appropriate action to continue you on active duty. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05717-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 4 April 2000 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for one day of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded restriction for two months and a forfeiture of $2,556, all of which was suspended for six months. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05718-00
Awarded to personnel in the naval service (2) Specific (a) To establish eligibility, the individual shall and serving on permanent duty have been attached to, present, with an organization in the naval service of the United States during those periods of time when such organization has been credited by SECNAV or by a delegated fleet command with having performed duty in the occupation of enemy or former enemy national territory. 2 October 1990 (d) Occupation duty in the Asiatic-Pacific...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05719-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to 15 days active duty pay. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05722-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and your failure to achieve the required average mark in conduct. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05723-02
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum of 31 July 2002 (3) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject ’s former spouse, hereinafter referred 1. to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05726-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05726-02
1552 Encl : (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC memorandum 1430 Ser 81 Subject’s naval record l/333 of 6 August 2002 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05727-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your record reflects that on 30 April 1973 you The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 July 1972 at the age of 19. received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a two day period of unauthorized absence (UA) and were awarded a $50 forfeiture of pay, which was suspended. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05729-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 5729-02 17 September 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05732-01
On 12 April 2000, the PEB made preliminary findings that he was unfit for duty because of chondromalacia findings on 21 April 2000, and apparently was advised that he would be discharged patella, right knee, which it rated at 10% disabling. ’s record be ’s It did not effect the corrective e. After being advised of the denial of his initial application, Petitioner submitted his present application, in which he contended that his release from active duty was erroneous, and that his record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05736-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.