DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 5636-00
13 April 2001
v
2001.
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 April
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 August 1981
at age 20.
The offenses included use of marijuana,
nonjudicial punishments.
fraudulent enlistment, failure to obey a lawful order on three
occasions, disrespect on three occasions, absence from your
appointed place of duty on three occasions, and bringing
to the Naval service on three occasions.
received a general discharge by reason of convenience of the
government in accordance with Project Upgrade.
Character of service was based, in part, on one's conduct and
both of which are computed from marks
overall traits averages,
Your conduct and overall
assigned during periodic evaluations.
Minimum average
trait averages were 2.00 and 2.15, respectively.
marks of 3.0 in conduct and 2.8 in overall traits were required
for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of
your separation.
In its review of your
applicatio the Board carefully weighed all
Your record reflects that you received two
d,isgrace
On 25 February 1982 you
such as your youth and immaturity
potentially mitigating factors,
and the contention that you were told that the discharge would be
However, the Board concluded that
upgraded after six months.
these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization
of your discharge given your disciplinary infractions, and since
your conduct and overall traits averages were insufficiently high
In this regard, no law
to warrant a fully honorable discharge.
or military regulation provides for upgrading a discharge based
solely on the passage of time.
been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
The names and votes of the members of the panel
Accordingly, your application has
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06242-01
conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. In this regard, no law or military regulation the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your three nonjudicial punishments as well as the fact that your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00322-11
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2011. Characterization of service is based, in part, on trait marks assigned on a periodic basis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05555-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Character of service is based, in part, on one's conduct and overall traits averages, both of which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07235-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Given your repetitive misconduct and failure to attain the behavior mark average required for a fully honorable characterization of service, the Board found that your service warranted a general characterization of service, and further noted that you were fortunate to have received such a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02635-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 December 1972, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05467-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9802013
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07039-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. conducted on 22 January 1965, diagnosed you with a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02969-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. nonjudicial punishments were more than sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06124-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...