DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No:
4 October
5726-01
2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 2 October
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
2002.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 10 November
1999 after three‘years of prior active service.
The record
reflects that on 21 January 2000 you received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) for provoking speeches and gestures, assault,
and drunk and disorderly conduct.
While your record does not contain the separation processing
documents and your psychiatric evaluation, it appears that the
commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an
honorable discharge by reason of personality disorder and, after
review by the discharge authority, the recommendation was
approved.
13 October 2000 with an honorable discharge by reason of
personality disorder.
At that time, you were assigned a
reenlistment code of RE-4.
The record clearly shows that you were discharged on
The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by
regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual
separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder, especially if
the servicemember has a disciplinary action in the record, such
as your NJP.
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02726-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors such as your youth and The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder, especially if the servicemember has a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08839-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02355-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03502-02
discharge by reason of personality disorder, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Enclosed is a DD Form 293, which you may use However, it cannot change a NDRB is Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02586-02
the separation authority directed separation, you received an general discharge 2001, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. byyeason of personality disorder on 30 March You After Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of Due to the severity of your personality personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03352-01
On 20 July 2000 you were notified of separation processing based In connection with this on the diagnosed personality disorder. You state in your application that you ideation in order to gain separation from the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08493-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2002. On 20 October 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00705-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08697-01
A three-member panel of the Board for CorrectLon of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07880-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2002. You were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.