DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
20 February 2001
5642-00
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 February 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 3 March 1987 at
age 19.
The record shows that on 24 June 1988 you were referred
for a follow up evaluation after you expressed suicidal ideation.
It states in the evaluation, in part, as follows:
VVcouldn't deal with
Told his supervisor that
this" anymore and made reference
.
. Was upset and frustrated after learning that his
.
administrative separation processing was stopped
because the command had failed to document his
maladjustment to the military.
he
to attempting suicide by shooting himself in the head.
Reportedly has a weapon collection and even has the
hollow point bullet picked out (complete with his name
on it) for the occasion.
The psychiatrist recommended expeditious administrative
separation because you were considered to be at risk to harm
yourself if retained in the Navy.
On 27 June 1988 you were notified of separation processing due to
the diagnosed personality disorder.
In connection with this
processing, you elected to waive your procedural rights.
Subsequently, the discharge authority directed an honorable
discharge.
you acknowledged that were not recommended for reenlistment and
were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
You were so discharged on 30 June 1988.
At that time
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality
disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when there is a
determination that an individual is at risk to harm himself or
others.
in your situation, the Board could not find an error or-injustice
in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
your application has been denied.
members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Since you have been treated no differently than others
The names and votes of the
Accordingly,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00980-01
980-01 14 June 2001 This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. applicat:.on for correction of your A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session,, considered your application on 12 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Iof an RE-4 reenlistment code Regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00084-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, you state that you lied to gain discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01316-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable and policies. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08063-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when an individual is considered at risk to harm himself or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00151-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session considered your application on 6 June injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06411-00
DEPIhRTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOf: CORRECTION OF 2 NAVY ANNE NA\‘AL RECORD X S W,,SHINGTON DC 20370 510 0 TRG Docket No: 7 June 2001 6411-00 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisior.s of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. execctive session, considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in application on 30 May injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01247-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder and such a code is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09027-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable Statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 June 1995, your commanding officer forwarded your case to the separation authority, recommending a general discharge. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04732-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval: Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...