NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05262-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2002. demonstrates that your discharge by reason of misconduct was improper, and establishes that you were unfit to perform your duties by reason of a physical disability which was incurred in or aggravated by your brief period of naval service, the Board was unable to recommend In the absence of evidence which any corrective action in your case. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05262-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted USNR(TAR), vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05262-99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the three enlisted performance evaluation reports for 16 July to 3 November 1998, 4 November 1998 to 3 February 1999, and 4 February to 3 May 1999. The second opinion recommended that her request be approved, stating that she would have been selected for advancement from Cycle 160,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05264-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05271-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2002. comments and a recommendation regarding Petitioner's request for 1 September 1971, the correction of his naval records. The Petitioner appears to be requesting a retrospective additional disability rating for diabetes mellitus and a left The Petitioner developed lower lobe pulmonary resection.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05272-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 5272-01 14 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Board of Correction of Naval Records. (Ma.jor Depressive The Should the petitioner have been retired by reason of physical disability service member did suffer from a psychiatric...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05279-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 23 September 2001. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05290-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. comment and recommendation on former requests the recoupment petition. case was ed portion of N130 recommends denial is not entitled to keep the SRB is a retention incentive paid to enlisted members serving 2 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05291-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05293-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon review...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05295-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, (2), the Board finds the existence of an contents of enclosure following corrective action. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval 4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05296-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone IT rating (NEC 2735). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05297-02
The GCMCA declined to act on Petitioner's specific complaint about the NJP since applicable directives state that such a disciplinary action is not a proper subject of an Article 138 complaint. OONOV02' to OlMAR15, as corrected by the (GCMCA), refers to the results of (NJP) where the charged deiekination that your Evaluation Report for the reporting period of;ense does not state an offense under the UCMJ. Paragraph 4 q. UCMJ Article 92(1)2 states that it is an offense to or beyond the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05301-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 4 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05306-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05312-02
The Board, consisting Petitioner ’s allegations regulations, available evidence of enclosures, naval 01‘ tlut record. records. delerniincd 01‘ c‘rror Ille hlcssrs.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05322-02
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed that the contested fitness report for 1 January to 30 September 1998 be amended by changing the reporting senior’s certification to reflect your peer ’s primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) was “7543 [EA-6B pilot], ” rather than “7204 [anti-air warfare]. In this regard, they substantially concurred with the advisory opinion from CMT with respect to the error in your peer unlikely that the discrepancy concerning...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05323-01
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following fitness report and related material: Date of Report Reporting Senior Period From of Report To 98Sep14 b. Based on that assessment, I recommend Lieutenant Commander itness report for the requested period and the Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENT LIEUTENANT COMMANDE "failure to select" be removed from her record, and that she considered by a Special Selection Board for promotion to the grade of Commander. The member...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05330-01
Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1070 MIFD 'AUG 0 i,jbi I, MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF SERGEANT SMC application with supporting documents has been reviewed concerning his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05331-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05336-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for a two year period of unauthorized absence, actions. the Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05338-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was separated from the Marine Corps with an honorable or a general discharge. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nofziger and Messrs. Chapman and Morgan, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05345-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 29 July 1980 you were convicted by a special court-martial of two periods of unauthorized absence totaling 131 days, from 31 You were sentenced to confinement at hard January to 26 March 1980 and 28 April to 14 July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05347-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (b) the decision to enroll/disenroll in the MGIB Program is irrevocable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05351-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05353-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject ’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP), pursuant to the BARBER decision. The Board, consisting of Mr. Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05353-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he added his spouse to his existing child only Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05355-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 3 January...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05357-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations state that an individual will normally receive an entry level separation during the first 180 days of continuous active military service or the first 180 days after a service break of more than 92 days of active service. You received an RE-3G reenlistment code, which is the most...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05361-02
f. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3H or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of hardship. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 3 July 2001, to RE-3H. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05362-02
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application oil were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05363-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05367-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a filed enclosure (1) with this former enlisted member of the Navy, that his naval record be corrected Board requesting, in effect, to show a more favorable type of discharge than the undesirable discharge issued on 17 June 1952. Based upon Petitioner's overall record of service and 2 current Department of the Navy policy as established in reference (b) and its radical departure from the policy which was in effect on 17 June 1952, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05377-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05384-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05388-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Inactive) status when you were Sl (Standby-Reserve Active) status on 6 August 1996, as you had expressed no The Board found it would not have been appropriate for cognizant naval authorities to bring up the possibility of transferring you to S2 (Standby Reserve transferred to interest in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05390-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, you never reported and were an You remained absent until Your military record shows that on 7 February 1977 you submitted a written request for a discharge under other than honorable conditions in order to avoid...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05390-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together 'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05393-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05396-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05402-02
He also requests that the filed enclosure (1) with this that his naval record be corrected 2. CONCLUSION: The Board's finding is based on Petitioner's overall Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial relief. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form of recharacterization to honorable is appropriate but that the reason for discharge remain unchanged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05404-02
01‘ the enclosures, naval records, and take11 c.onhistcd a. ’s application has co~n~mvtetl to the effect that the CONCLlJSION Upon review ant1 contents of enclosure following corrective action. Records (32 Code of Federal present at the Board record of the Board ’s of ’s review the revised Regulations.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05407-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. review, you were so discharged on 15 September 1976. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05415-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 921 of 31 July 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF Per reference (c), 6 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05421-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05426-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-2000 5420~ N13 12 ODl/ Aug 2002 H~PLY RLFE~~ IO 02UO438 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION NAVAL RECORDS OF Subj: N THE CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05426-02 with microfiche service record llowing provides...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05428-01
Your allegations of error and A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support The After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05428-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. SNM enlisted before 26 Jul 2000.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05429-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Apparently in 2002, you realized that with 21 years of total service in the Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve, you might be eligible for reserve retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05431-01
I do not own a vehicle and due to hurricane Despite my repeated requests to be excused from Reserve activities and be transferred to the Inactive Ready Reserve (IRR) based upon my hardship situation and in accordance with Marine Corps regulations, I was shocked to learn that my unit is planning to vacate my noncommissioned officer status (i.e. demote me) and ultimately discharge me from the Marine Corps. contacted or appeared at the reserve center insufficient time to have his request for...