Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05301-02
Original file (05301-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC: ddj
Docket No: 5301-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
Your allegations of error and injustice were
considered your application on 4 September 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted  in support thereof,  your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1811 PERS-823 Ser-073 of 3 1 July 2002, a copy of
which is attached. Also, attached is a copy of the statute which is applicable.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosures

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
PERSONNEL COMMAN
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

N AVY 

MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

Y

D

1811
PERS-823
Ser-073
31 July 2002
432-70-4082

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF HIGHEST

GRADE HELD

(a) Title 10,

United States Code,  

Set

633 4

1.

2 .

A review of your service record reveals
with reference (a) you are not entitled
the retired list.
in a reserve status you are not eligible for advancement.
No further action is needed on your request.

Since your rank/rating was obtained while

that in accordance
to advancement on

F

add iti on 
and 

to the  
disrcg;ird 

IIII
all\

Pub.L.
(Added  
amei
1089,  and 
1989, 103 Stat.

1987 Acts.

Revision Notes  
 
House 
and 
100-446, see  
Adm. News,
 

ar
Ho1
CC
196
10
p. 
1989  Acts.  Hoi
Conlerenc

House 

American Digest

Armed 

Servi,

Encyclopedias

C.J.S. 

Armec

Vp 

241 JO  
paFn!Isqns 
‘P)

3asqns 

uo!lsaS 
#I
ayl,, 
-1oJ 

S!ql JO  
‘P 
,,L861 
§ ‘ 681-101 
.~uarupuawy

‘(a)zz91  

lLlXlIIZ=ua
-=ww,,
‘l’qnJ
6861

quampuamv

.gfg 
6861 

.d 
‘SM~N  
aaS 

‘wpv pue
‘lUap!S3ld  

 
.cq 

apes 
.Buo~ 
lu3LUalsIs 

.S.n
pus

‘IEE-,O, 
‘ON 
‘IzI-IoI  ‘ ON 

uodq 

~JOd3~ 

.XXK.I~JUO~ 

XnOH

.3uo3 
pue 
IJodaa
‘ON
8s-001 ‘ ON 

s~~oda~ 

3pq 

-s-n 

~XI~~~JLlO~
Ilodaa 
angeIs@aT  

3snoH 
pur? 

6861

‘SMaN  

sSnoH 
-K’V 
.8 I  
() I  
.d 
L861 
aas 
JsnoH 
.sl3’cT 

‘UIPV
‘9PbOOI
pm?

L@jI

saloN 

uo!s!r\ax

STLON 

X2IOUUVJS  

CINV 

-lWItIO.LSIH



Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00384_Redacted

    SNOIAald (ZA-da) 00 NV ‘£407-0 ANMOA OHAV ue }IUIgNS 0} 14311 OU) pue ‘JasuNod ynoyW MIM souRIesdde yeuosiod v 0} 1YSII ay) “‘preog ay) Jo UOTSIDap ay} Jo juRoTdde asiapy 1002-29102 GIN ‘dV SMAYGNV TrLp-0S 18L XL ‘dAV Hd TOGNVY YHOO aue ‘ONIM Az ‘Ad GNVWINOD sEst OF ALINS ‘LSAM LAAMLS O0ss aavod MAIATY ADAVHOSIG ADO YIV AUMINVAVS TIDNN0D TANNOS 84d ADAOd UV AHL 4O AMVLANIAS 1WOUd OL ‘ysonbar s jueordde ayy ye yuvordde oy} 0} ojqeyTeae opeul aq [JIM SoJ0A pue soweN "UNOGAV 24} 0}...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00464

    Original file (FD2006-00464.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 1 1 1 1 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRS'I' MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 1 GRADE 1 AFSNISSAN PERSONAL, APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COllNbEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRFSS A N 0 OR ORLANIZAI ION Ok COUNbLL TYl'h CEN coUNS'L YES I No X L..-..-....-..-..-.----------- ISSUES A92.21 A93.01 - - - - - Ih'DEY hll3lBER A66.00 1 IIIARINC DA I E EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD 1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 2 1 APPLICA'I'ION I'OK KBVIBW OI'...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 03198-11

    Original file (03198-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was modified, and on 23 May 1996 you were separated with a general...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05721-03

    Original file (05721-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ?,lve determined that only members who transfer to the Fleet ;3eserve after 4 December 1987 are eligible for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 06586-98

    Original file (06586-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY WAVY P E R I O W W U C O Y Y A N D 5720 IWTE9RWY DRIVE MILLIWOTON I N 38055-0000 1830 Pers823 Ser 45 1 1 Jun 1999 Subj: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO - Ref: (a) Pers-OOXCB ltr of 3 1 March 1999 NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File with Microfiche Service Record MEMORANDUM...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06444-06

    Original file (06444-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Nava1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10286-02

    Original file (10286-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    104—450, see 1996 U.S. Code Cong.and Adm. News, p. 238.House Report No. (b)(1) as so designated, substituted “under this section” for “under this chapter”, and added subsecs. Amendment to this section by section 635(b) of Pub.L.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5899 14

    Original file (NR5899 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1 \ o M H " o 3 ; cs c = . et oO ) { 1 v | oO Vv a 'O a ‘ { ct Pa a 13 a os { a J p = se ) w ¢ va OU wW 4 s 4 ud : a 1 1 O 4H Sak oO = cg a 4 Hw OO ms ‘ ul 1) $4 i oO a ee ' q U oO iJ Y a 3 i ~ w ae a y w oO ) \ , ec ; O & /) — eH ri ++ 4 1 } ans QO . oO ¢ 2 yw cof x ci a4 a 1 O-4 Oo x $} G@ O M 2 oO =A YD i io i) ri = O WH © + m4 ~~ = r { > = > = O-d ia Bon © - > za ou mM WO cl » 3 wa w oan it a Hoo @ y Oc e 1 HG El le Za HOW 6 an.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03865-03

    Original file (03865-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7220 PERS-823 of 2 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03110-08

    Original file (03110-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...