DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 5306-02
17 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser
copy of which is attached.
32/6166 of 27 August 2002, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND
5722 INTEGRITY DR.
MILLINGTON. TENNESSEE 38054-5057
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1133
Ser
‘XT
32/bib
b
4 ;a
i&i?
Commander,
Executive Director,
Navy Recruiting Command
Board for Correction of Naval Records
BCNR REQUEST IC
(a) COMNAVCRUITCOMINST
1130.8F
(1) BCNR Docket Nr. 05306-02
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
1966/4 provided in enclosure
Recommend disapproval of enclosure (1).
1.
and DD form
in the PRISE III program,
but was authorized to enlist into ET rating with ET "A" School by
the Enlisted Community Manager.
was too great to authorize without attending "A" school again.
His enlistment contract length is correct.
which is a rating conversion program,
SNM's excessive break-in-service
Per reference (a)
(l), SNM did not enlist
This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for
2.
Correction of Naval Records'only.
Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07826-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive ap,lication on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6207 of 13 November 2002, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03644-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. a copy of which opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08644-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04122-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05291-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02
A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02472-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02389-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per enclosure (1) paygrade determination was initially made the This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07478-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. additio?, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 3216196 of 10 October 2002, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01667-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. he was authorized to enlist in his old rating (OS), but the ECM authorized him to come back in the initial active duty service date...