ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008368
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) for wrongful use of Ecstasy between on or about (080322 and 080324, 080419- 080421), wrongful use of D-methamphetamine (080322 and 080324, 080419-080421), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008369
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 November 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor failing to obey NCO orders (111012); made a false official statement to an NCO (110930); failing to report to his appointed place of duty x 3 (110224), (110721), (110725); and disrespectful towards an NCO (110325), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008371
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant's contentions were carefully considered, to include the self authored statement submitted by the applicant. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 dated 11 April 2012 in lieu of a DD Form 293.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008372
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 23 April 2012 with self-authored statement; Court Orders, dated 6 January 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008373
The Army is all he knows and he is pleading with the Review Board to please allow this change and allow him a second chance to prove himself. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 January 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008374
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, as stated by the applicant, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008391
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she is requesting an upgrade of her discharge to honorable following the release from active duty for being AWOL because her family care plan had failed and she had no choice (death of provider). c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008397
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 November 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions b.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008453
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 May 2011, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, in that he was diagnosed with hereditary palmoplantar keratoderma, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians, the conditions existed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008530
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 July 2001, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008567
On 22 June 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions. On 23 September 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008571
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 August 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for failing to report to his appointed place of duty between (110206 and 110418), being disrespectful towards a noncommissioned officer (110208), being arrested (110402) for driving while intoxicated, and for testing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008572
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of the applicants available military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008575
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 November 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The record indicates that the separation authority approved the discharge under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c for misconduct (serious offense); however, the applicants DD Form 214 shows the reason for his separation as pattern of misconduct under authority of AR...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008650
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008651
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 April 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008652
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I believe I should recieve an honorable discharge because I served my time in the Army reserves as indicated when I first became an officer. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-175 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of officers from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), except for officers serving on active duty or active duty...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008818
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 December 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for testing positive on a urinalysis for Cocaine and Marijuana (051007 - 051106), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority approved the conditional...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008821
Applicant Name: ????? The record indicates that prior to receiving separation notification from the commander, the applicant consulted with legal counsel on 23 December 2002, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008825
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor, showing up intoxicated for the proper performance of his duties x 2 (101129), (110307), failing to report (101129); absenting himself from his unit (AWOL)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008893
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for the wrongful use of marijuana between 23 December 2007 and 23 January 2008, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008907
Applicant Name: ????? Total Service: 03 Yrs, 01 Mos, 16 Days The DD Form 214 under review makes reference to the applicant having 01 mos and 02 days of prior active service, however the record is void of an documents in support of this claim. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008913
On 19 October 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008944
Applicant Name: ????? On 20 December 2000, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: On-line Application, four reference letters of character and a DD Form 214.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008985
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214, indicates that she was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required period of ADT, with an uncharacterized discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of period of ADT, with service uncharacterized.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008997
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on July 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for refusing to train since learning he would be unable to obtain the security clearance required for attendance at OCS, with an uncharacterized discharge. For separation under Chapter 11, the regulation requires an uncharacterized discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009006
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished his quality of service below that meriting an honorable discharge. In review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted;...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009008
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for the wrongful use of marijuana between (050424 and 050524) and for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for the wrongful use of marijuana (050504), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009015
Applicant Name: ????? Total Service: 01 Yrs, 05 Mos, 09 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) for wrongful use of a prohibited substance (110330), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009086
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 January 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E-4/SPC.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009147
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 November 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for pleading guilty/no contest to 2 charges of theft of property, value not less than $50 but not more than $500, (081028) an offense the applicant committed (080907), with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009151
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 July 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, for wrongfully using marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 July 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009153
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009156
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009158
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions, because he had 4 years of good service in the Army which included a combat tour in Iraq and states he was under psychiatric care. Chapter 10 provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009166
The Board recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 July 2011, the Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009182
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I am a former US Army enlisted member. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009196
Applicant Name: ????? Further, the applicant indicated she understood that she could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veterans benefits. On 13 January 2003, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009200
Applicant Name: ????? The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this Chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under Chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009203
Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK." Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009214
Applicant Name: ????? On 12 January 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009317
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, paragraph 15-3b, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 2 August 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of her case by an administrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009329
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NA Discharge Received: Date: 030721 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200 Reason: Physical Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: 120th Adjutant General Battalion, Fort Jackson, SC Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009335
Following completion of MOS training course, the applicant was released from active duty training, with an effective date of 17 May 1997. b. In the case of an ARNGUS or USAR Soldier on active duty (AD) or active duty training (ADT) who is to be discharged, the character of the period of service from which he/she is being discharged will be based solely on military behavior and performance of duty during the current period of service while actually performing AD or ADT. A Soldier is in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009391
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009465
On 29 June 2006, the applicant waived his right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 14 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009466
Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a Military Police Report, dated 22 August 2011 and a GOMOR, dated 22 October 2010. b. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009467
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2012/05/11 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 120330 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failed Medical/Physical/Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: D Co, 2-34th IN Bn, Fort Jackson, SC Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009476
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 February 2005, unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, specifically for wrongfully using MDMA (ecstasy) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 February 2005, the applicant declined legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009477
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 October 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 19 October 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.