Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/30 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states: "I believe I should recieve an honorable discharge because I served my time in the Army reserves as indicated when I first became an officer. I initially was enlisted in the Navy and then transferred to the Army as a 1st LT. I served until I became unintentionally pregnant and realized after the father of my child abandoned me, that I did not have a parenting time plan for my child. I had attempted to separate from the Army since just after her birth, but was given misinformation and it took over 2 years for the discharge. My unit did not provide me with the accurate information to be discharged. I had to separate to protect my child."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 110429 Chapter: NIF AR: 135-175
Reason: NIF RE: SPD: NIF Unit/Location: 320th Med Co CSH, Greensboro, NC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 30
Current ENL Date: 040402 Current ENL Term: Indefinite Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 07 Yrs, 00 Mos, 28 Days ?????
Total Service: 09 Yrs, 10 Mos, 29 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USNR-010531-040401/NA
Highest Grade: O3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 66H/Clinical Nurse GT: NA EDU: NIF Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NIF
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence shows the applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to her discharge from the United States Army Reserve. The record indicates that on 31 March 2011, DA US Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, AHRC-OPNPR10-11, Orders D-03-105138, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 29 April 2011, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
The record contains a properly constituted Order, which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 135-175, the reason for the applicants discharge is not contained in the available record.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 135-175 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of officers from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), except for officers serving on active duty or active duty training exceeding 90 days. Chapters 2 and 3 provide the basis for involuntary separation of USAR officers. Specific categories include substandard performance of duty, moral or professional dereliction, in the interest of national security, as a result of trial by court martial, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without proper authority from unit training. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the term of service under review, the issues, and the documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the former Soldiers discharge from the United States Army Reserve. However, the record shows that on 31 March 2011, DA US Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, AHRC-OPNPR10-11, Orders D-03-105138, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 29 April 2011, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicants discharge are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
The analyst noted the applicant's contentions; however, the analyst is unable to determine whether her contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown. The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 26 September 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Online application, Self-Authored Statement, Discharge Orders, dated 31 March 2011, DA Form 3575, dated 5 March 2004, DA Form 71, dated 2 April 2004, and Memorandum for Application for Appointment with Nonconcurrent Call to Active Duty in the Army Reserve Nurse Corps.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the term of service under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20120008652
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012748
Records show that the applicant failed to respond to the notification of separation and notification of the administrative separation board hearing. The applicant contends that he could not attend annual drill because of 100% VA Disability rating and 100% Unemployability rating, distance from drill location imposed extreme hardship due to residence outside of the continental United States, Philippine Islands, and the Command was informed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020087
The Board recommended the applicant be separated with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. S Army Reserve involuntarily separated her after she had failed to participate with her reserve unit and issued her an under other than honorable discharge. Arlington, VA Date: 1 April 2013 The Army Discharge Review Board, under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in page 1, directs the ARBA Promulgation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20100030274
It is to my understanding that the Army has enacted the Lodging in Kind policy for soldiers who travel greater than a 50 mile radius to drill unit effective 26 May of 2008. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004890
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 October 2003, the separation authority approved the Board's recommendation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015037
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The record indicates that on 27 July 2004, Department of the Army, Headquarters, US Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, issued Orders 04-209-00031, which discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, with an effective date of: 27 August 2004, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003614
I was shocked to find out after processing that the Commander, HRC St Louis issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge as a result of my resignation. The record indicates that on 22 July 2008, Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, 1 Reserve Way, St Louis, MO 63132, Orders D-07-818919, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 22 July 2008, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004397
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060005784
Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the term of service under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was inequitable based on the overall length of the applicant's service, the circumstances surrounding the discharge, and her post service accomplishments. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110000692
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2011/01/07 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: That he resigned in lieu of involuntary separation proceedings and was issued a General Discharge Under Honorable Conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008268
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states that: "I found out I was pregnant in April 05 and let my NCO and unit know my husband (fiancee at the time) and I did not have a person for a Family Care Plan in Aug 05. My 1SGT was not there at that drill so I had to wait until Sept 05 drill. Then I found out a year later my unit had transfered me and had discharged me.