Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008652
Original file (AR20120008652.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/30	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states: "I believe I should recieve an honorable discharge because I served my time in the Army reserves as indicated when I first became an officer.  I initially was enlisted in the Navy and then transferred to the Army as a 1st LT.  I served until I became unintentionally pregnant and realized after the father of my child abandoned me, that I did not have a parenting time plan for my child.  I had attempted to separate from the Army since just after her birth, but was given misinformation and it took over 2 years for the discharge.  My unit did not provide me with the accurate information to be discharged. I had to separate to protect my child."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110429   Chapter: NIF    AR: 135-175
Reason: NIF	   RE:     SPD: NIF   Unit/Location: 320th Med Co CSH, Greensboro, NC 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  30
Current ENL Date: 040402    Current ENL Term: Indefinite Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	07 Yrs, 00  Mos, 28  Days ?????
Total Service:  		09 Yrs, 10  Mos, 29  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USNR-010531-040401/NA
Highest Grade: O3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 66H/Clinical Nurse   GT: NA   EDU: NIF   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NIF

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to her discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  The record indicates that on 31 March 2011, DA US Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, AHRC-OPNPR10-11, Orders D-03-105138, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 29 April 2011, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       The record contains a properly constituted Order, which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 135-175, the reason for the applicant’s discharge is not contained in the available record.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-175 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of officers from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), except for officers serving on active duty or active duty training exceeding 90 days.  Chapters 2 and 3 provide the basis for involuntary separation of USAR officers.  Specific categories include substandard performance of duty, moral or professional dereliction, in the interest of national security, as a result of trial by court martial, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without proper authority from unit training.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the term of service under review, the issues, and the documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the former Soldier’s discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  However, the record shows that on 31 March 2011, DA US Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY, AHRC-OPNPR10-11, Orders D-03-105138, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 29 April 2011, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's contentions; however, the analyst is unable to determine whether her contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.  
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 26 September 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application, Self-Authored Statement, Discharge Orders, dated 31 March 2011, DA Form 3575, dated 5 March 2004, DA Form 71, dated 2 April 2004, and Memorandum for Application for Appointment with Nonconcurrent Call to Active Duty in the Army Reserve Nurse Corps.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the term of service under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder




















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20120008652
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012748

    Original file (AR20100012748.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show that the applicant failed to respond to the notification of separation and notification of the administrative separation board hearing. The applicant contends that he could not attend annual drill because of 100% VA Disability rating and 100% Unemployability rating, distance from drill location imposed extreme hardship due to residence outside of the continental United States, Philippine Islands, and the Command was informed. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020087

    Original file (AR20120020087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board recommended the applicant be separated with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. S Army Reserve involuntarily separated her after she had failed to participate with her reserve unit and issued her an under other than honorable discharge. Arlington, VA Date: 1 April 2013 The Army Discharge Review Board, under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in page 1, directs the ARBA Promulgation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20100030274

    Original file (AR20100030274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is to my understanding that the Army has enacted the Lodging in Kind policy for soldiers who travel greater than a 50 mile radius to drill unit effective 26 May of 2008. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004890

    Original file (AR20110004890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 October 2003, the separation authority approved the Board's recommendation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015037

    Original file (AR20110015037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The record indicates that on 27 July 2004, Department of the Army, Headquarters, US Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, issued Orders 04-209-00031, which discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, with an effective date of: 27 August 2004, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003614

    Original file (AR20090003614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was shocked to find out after processing that the Commander, HRC St Louis issued an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge as a result of my resignation. The record indicates that on 22 July 2008, Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, 1 Reserve Way, St Louis, MO 63132, Orders D-07-818919, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 22 July 2008, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004397

    Original file (AR20110004397.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060005784

    Original file (AR20060005784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the term of service under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was inequitable based on the overall length of the applicant's service, the circumstances surrounding the discharge, and her post service accomplishments. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110000692

    Original file (AR20110000692.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2011/01/07 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: That he resigned in lieu of involuntary separation proceedings and was issued a General Discharge Under Honorable Conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008268

    Original file (AR20080008268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states that: "I found out I was pregnant in April 05 and let my NCO and unit know my husband (fiancee at the time) and I did not have a person for a Family Care Plan in Aug 05. My 1SGT was not there at that drill so I had to wait until Sept 05 drill. Then I found out a year later my unit had transfered me and had discharged me.