Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009196
Original file (AR20120009196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2012/05/11	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I joined the military in order to serve my country, not knowing what it entailed during boot camp, not knowing that I would catch mono or mess up my neck in hand to hand combat.  I enjoyed every minute of it though, mono and all, and if I can not re-enlist to better serve my country in a manner in which I couldn't as a young lady, I would like to at least get some kind of medical benefits that would help me with my physical and mental disabilities dealt with.  And also it is effecting my employment searches, I am currently a homeless and jobless vet and I can not procure employment or anything else of importance with an other than honorable discharge.  I would really appreciate if you could consider my request, it is of great importance to me  and I am regretful of the actions that I have made in order to receive this discharge in the first place."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 030107
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 030122   Chapter: 10      AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu Of Trial By Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: Company G, 244th QM Battalion, Fort Lee, VA 

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 for a total of 131 days (020822 - 030102); surrendered.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 020506    Current ENL Term: 4  Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	0  Yrs, 4  Mos, 3  Days ?????
Total Service:  		0  Yrs, 4  Mos, 3  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 96   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None







VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 7 January 2003, the applicant was charged with AWOL (020822 - 030103).  
       
       On 7 January 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser-included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated she understood that she could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander and intermediate commanders recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 13 January 2003, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.  The applicant was reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.   

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of the applicant’s available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  
       
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. 
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's employment issue; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       There is no evidence of record and the applicant has submitted no probative medical evidence that she had a medical problem which rendered her disqualified for further military service and that she was not able to perform her duties, with either medical limitation or medication.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue about her desire to use VA benefits.  However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include medical and educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill do not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       At the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service and was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” both of which constitute a non-waivable disqualification, thus the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 3 October 2012         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: On-line Application and a DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:


ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board



BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder




Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20120009196
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017614

    Original file (AR20070017614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 October 2002, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016533

    Original file (AR20070016533.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: None VIII.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016063

    Original file (AR20070016063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Issue a new...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013709

    Original file (AR20080013709.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 10 June 2003, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E3 ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005799

    Original file (AR20080005799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012267

    Original file (AR20100012267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The analyst noted the applicant's issues that he went AWOL because his Company Commander had tried to Court-Martial him and that he is looking into furthering his education and employment...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090019874

    Original file (AR20090019874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "The reason why I would like my discharge characterization changed to a general is because I believe that with a general code I will be able to better myself and provide a better future for my family. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080019278

    Original file (AR20080019278.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003838

    Original file (AR20080003838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ?????

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070014410

    Original file (AR20070014410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? I thank the Board for their time. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.