Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/30 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she requests an upgrade of her discharge to honorable. She contends the discharge she received is unjust because she completed all the training for basic and advanced individual training (AIT). She further contends failing the physical fitness test because she passed out on the track while running due to asthma. She also contends being unaware of the type of dicharge she received because she lacked knowledge and education on Army procedures.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 980126 Chapter: 4 AR: 635-200
Reason: Completion of Period of ADT RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: B Co, 187th Medical Bn, Fort Sam Houston, TX
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 970827/OADT Current ENL Term: NIF Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 05 Mos, 00 Days ?????
Total Service: 01 Yrs, 02 Mos, 05 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-961122-970826/NA
(Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 88 EDU: 11 Years Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant earned a BA Degree.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicant's record is void of the orders releasing her from active duty training and returning her to her unit. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature. The DD Form 214, indicates that she was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required period of ADT, with an uncharacterized discharge. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a separation (SPD) code of "NA," with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "NA."
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200, sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 4 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, for the separation of individuals at completion of required service (i.e., expiration term of service). The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, will be honorable unless the Soldier is in an entry-level status. The service of Soldiers in an entry-level status will be uncharacterized. A Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty at the time of the discharge or relief from active duty.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of period of ADT, with service uncharacterized.
The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when separated in entry-level status.
For USAR Soldiers, entry-level status begins upon enlistment in the USAR. For Soldiers ordered to IADT for one continuous period, it terminates 180 days after beginning training. For Soldiers ordered to IADT for the split or alternate training option, it terminates 90 days after beginning Phase II advanced individual training (AIT).
A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.
The applicant's contentions were carefully considered. However, the analyst is unable to determine whether his contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown. The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
Further, any individual who has served for less than 180 days at the time his commander initiated separation action, and is not being separated for serious misconduct, will be given an uncharacterized discharge. This is not an adverse separation action and denotes only that the individual had less than 180 days on active duty.
Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that based on the DD Form 214, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 5 October 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, dated (120420); Discharge Orders 320-353, dated (981116); DD Form 214, dated (980126); DA Form 2-1, four (4) pages, dated (970828); Transcript, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, five (5) pages, dated (120316); Wikipedia Encyclopedia, Military Discharge Terms, eight (8) pages, dated (120416); and a Resume, six (6) pages, dated (120418).
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20120008985
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020575
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 APRIL 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120020575 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the enclosed Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The record shows the applicant, while in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005798
In the case of an ARNGUS or USAR Soldier on active duty (AD) or active duty training (ADT) who is to be discharged, the character of the period of service from which he/she is being discharged will be based solely on military behavior and performance of duty during the current period of service while actually performing AD or ADT. The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009335
Following completion of MOS training course, the applicant was released from active duty training, with an effective date of 17 May 1997. b. In the case of an ARNGUS or USAR Soldier on active duty (AD) or active duty training (ADT) who is to be discharged, the character of the period of service from which he/she is being discharged will be based solely on military behavior and performance of duty during the current period of service while actually performing AD or ADT. A Soldier is in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010923
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of period of active duty training, with service uncharacterized. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 does not indicate a Separation Code. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014146
Applicant Name: ????? A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019104
Facts and Circumstances: The record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicants signature. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003360
The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in entry-level status was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with character of service described as uncharacterized. However, the characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation is normally honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110021561
Her DD Form 214 indicates she was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015236
However, her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. The evidence of record shows that the applicant, while in entry-level status, was released from active duty for training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200, by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. Certification Signature Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | ar20110022466
His DD Form 214 indicates he was released from active duty training under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-200 by reason of completion of required active service, with service uncharacterized. In the case of an ARNGUS or USAR Soldier on active duty (AD) or active duty training (ADT) who is to be discharged, the character of the period of service from which he/she is being discharged will be based solely on military behavior and performance of duty during the current period of service...