ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007420
Applicant Name: ????? On 16 March 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 5 March 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007429
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 October 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, for being AWOL (020617-020707), and stealing money orders (020514), the property of other persons, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 4 October 2002, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007493
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is making a request to make the military his future option. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit a change to the narrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007568
On 6 October 2004, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of an under other than honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 23 March 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007569
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) for testing positive for cocaine on (100504), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 June 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007570
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2012/04/09 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. On 30 January 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007575
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record does not contain the unit commander's documentation notifying the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007576
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 July 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Commission of a Serious Offense) for disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer, willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, disrespect toward a noncommissioned officer, disobeying a lawful order from a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007578
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongfully disobeying a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer (110211), pushing a noncommissioned officer (110211), willfully disobeying a lawful command from a commissioned officer...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007579
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 8 January 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007581
Applicant Name: ????? He completed over 177 missions while in Iraq and completed his combat tour before making that life changing mistake. After returning from lraq, he began having flashbacks, nightmares, and turned to alcohol to cope and he does not remember using cocaine.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007583
On 8 February 2012, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (120301); and an e-mail, dated (090522).
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007584
Applicant Name: ????? On 22 October 2002, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007587
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007590
It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The analyst noted the PTSD diagnosis from an independent counseling center diagnosing the applicnat with PTSD. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and the characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007591
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for absenting himself from his unit (AWOL) x 2 (070505-070510), (070705-070706); failing to report to his appointed place of duty x 5; dereliction of duty; assault and receiving several counseling statements for other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007594
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 August 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007596
On 25 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007598
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 October 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, the applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007599
Subsequently, the separation authority would have approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions; however, there is no record of the approval. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007600
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007605
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being disrespectful to a noncommissioned officer and an officer (100304), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board determined that the length and quality of the applicants service, to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007609
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he received injustice treatment from his first line supervisor. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The applicants statements alone do not overcome the governments presumption of regularity and he has not provided any...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007611
The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 3 December 2001, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that a bi-polar disorder was the underlying cause of his misconduct.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007617
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178, sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007632
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 26 January 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007648
By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished his quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. The analyst noted the applicant's issue about having to explain to employers about his current characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007658
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007664
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 10 February 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007673
Therefore base on the applicant's dated of enlistment and the period of AWOL his total service should be: 01 yrs, 01 mos, and 24 days. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs; going AWOL (070713-070720) should be (070715-070720);...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007691
Applicant Name: ????? He was home exactly seven days out of 14 days leave when she passed away. The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007693
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I had no problems in my early service, but the deployment to Kuwait and the service in Iraq staging and at the beginning of the war effected me. On 6 April 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007695
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 March 2009, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service, but suspended it for a period of six (6) months. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry eligibility (RE) code is RE 4.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007709
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 April 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, paragraph 11-2, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for not being able to meet the minimum standards prescribed for successful completion of training, failure of the Solderization process, and for having a history of an inability to learn, with an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007918
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 July 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and stated that on 23 February 2011, he elected to have an administrative separation board and requested an honorable discharge; however, he waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and a personal appearance before the board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007921
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 June 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for committing an assault upon Mrs. KA, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicants contentions of racism and being picked out by his chain of command;...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007926
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 27 February 2012 and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007927
Applicant Name: ????? The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK." The record indicates that despite the recommendation of the unic commander for a general, under honorable conditions discharge, the brigade commander, considering all aspects of his service record, and the recommendation of his unit commander saw fit to recommend an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007951
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that after serving in Iraq and being injured, he began to suffer from nightmares about the war zone, was having problems sleeping and was suffering from pain problems beyond the control provided by his medications. The record shows that before initiating action to separate the applicant, the command ensured the applicant was appropriately counseled about his deficiencies,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008019
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 November 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008069
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Serious Offense) for wrongfully possessing a chemically augmented herbal substance on or about (100429), failure to report to a 0700 PT/acountability formation(100824), and drunk on duty (101015), with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008163
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "While my discharged (sic) at basic training in Ft. Leonard Wood Missouri was being processed, I was told that after my enlistment period was completed, I would be able to change the status of my discharge to honorable." Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 990702 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failure to Meet Procurement Medical Fitness...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008169
Applicant Name: ????? Post Service Accomplishments: Records show the applicant served in the Army National Guard (031119-070116) with a characterization of service of honorable. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated 16 April 2012, Orders, dated 14 February 2002, Amended Orders, dated 5 March 2002, DA Form 2-1, dated 29 June 2001, Enlisted Record Brief, Discharge Order, dated 18 January 2007; Army National Guard Retirement Points, dated...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008186
Applicant Name: ????? By allowing my DD 214 to be changed from Under Honorable Conditions to full Honorable discharge I would be able to either return to active duty in the US Military or be able to seek employment in the civilian world. On 28 December 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008225
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 February 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for absent without leave (071114 071210) and testing positive for the wrongful use of cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 June 2009, the applicant consulted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008227
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of the applicants available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008327
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Section II, Paragraph 14-5a(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, conviction by civil court, for being convicted of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) by District Court (070927); and receiving a sentence of two years unsupervised probation; 30 days in jail, suspended on the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008355
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 April 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for being AWOL five times (080912 081007), (090217 090317), (090603 090605), (090612 090824), (100308 100322); and being arrested (100210) by civilian authorities for shoplifting, with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008363
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 November 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for attempting forcible sodomy resulting in a Summary Court-Martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 27 November 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008367
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "The discharge of Bad Conduct is unwarranted because of a conflict with a soldier that had issues with me. After a thorough review of the applicants records and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.