Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012212
Original file (AR20110012212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/06/09	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions.  He contends being advised his discharge would be upgraded after 6 months. He further contends being young and incompetent.  He desires to reenlist and deploy.   

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090805   Chapter: 13    AR: 135-178
Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation      	   RE:  NIF   SPD: NA   Unit/Location: Field Maint Tm, 486th EN Co, Monclova, OH 

Time Lost: NIF

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  17
Current ENL Date: 070502    Current ENL Term: 08 Years  00
Current ENL Service: 	02  Yrs, 03 Mos, 04 Days ?????
Total Service:  		02  Yrs, 06 Mos, 12 Days the analyst utilized the applicant's enlistment contract, DD Form 214, and separation orders for computing the period of enlistment under review and the total service.
Previous Discharges: 	IADT-080723-081031/UNC
                                         (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 63B10 Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic   GT: 103   EDU: 10 Years   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:   
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the United States Army Reserve are not contained in the available records.  On 5 August 2009, DA, HQS, 416th Theater Engineer Command, Darien, IL, Orders 09-217-00012, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date:  5 August 2009, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.
       
       
       
       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-178, governs procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army Reserve.  Chapter 13 of the regulation provides in pertinent part that individuals can be separated for being an unsatisfactory participant.  Army Regulation 135-91 states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills occur during a 1 year period and attempts to have the Soldier respond or comply with orders or correspondence have resulted in— the Soldier’s refusal to comply with orders or correspondence; or a notice sent by certified mail was refused, unclaimed, or otherwise undeliverable; or verification that the Soldier has failed to notify the command of a change of address and reasonable attempts to contact the Soldier have failed.  Discharge action may be taken when the Soldier cannot be located or is absent in the hands of civil authorities in accordance with the provisions of AR 135-91, paragraph 2-18, and Chapter 3, section IV, of AR 135–178.   Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge from the United States Army Reserve are not contained in the available records.
        
       On 5 August 2009, DA, HQS, 416th Theater Engineer Command, Darien, IL, Orders 09-217-00012, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date:  5 August 2009, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  By the applicant's failure to perform to standards diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a general, under honorable conditions.
       
       The applicant contends being advised his discharge would be upgraded after 6 months.  The U.S. Army does not have, nor has it ever had, a policy to automatically upgrade discharges.  Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge.  Changes may be warranted if the Board determines that the characterization of service or the reason for discharge or both were improper or inequitable.
       
       The applicant further contends being young and incompetent.  The applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
       
       The applicant desires to reenlist and deploy to serve his country.  However, at the time of discharge, the applicant received an under other than honorable conditions discharge which constitutes a non-waiverable disqualification, thus the applicant is no longer eligible to reenlist. 
       
       Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration.
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that based on the discharge orders, the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 20 December 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (110624); and a DD Form 214, dated (080723).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 1    No change 4
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????




Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110012212
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011290

    Original file (AR20090011290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. However, on 6 January 2009, Headquarters, 416th Theater Engineer Command, 108100 S. Frontage Rd, Darien, IL, Orders 09-006-00022, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date: 30 January 2009, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016312

    Original file (AR20090016312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 13-1, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant contends that he was suffering from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which caused him not to be able to function properly as a Soldier. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110014905

    Original file (AR20110014905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant, states in effect, that he was unjustly discharged and reduced in rank because he had requested to be released from his contract due to his 50 percent PTSD disability rating which was service connected as determined by the Veterans Administration. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015632

    Original file (AR20090015632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as the former Soldier’s record of available evidence related to his unsatisfactory participation in the US Army Reserve. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011383

    Original file (AR20100011383.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After his service in Iraq he could not stand being around people in uniform so he stopped going to scheduled drills. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120002833

    Original file (AR20120002833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Although all the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process, the available record does show periods during which the applicant was credited with attending drills and/or inactive duty training. The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100029585

    Original file (AR20100029585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to restore former service member's grade, rate or rank. The Board may only change the characterization of service or reason for discharge. Yes No Counsel: [ redacted ] Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (101130); Letter, The American Legion, dated (101208); DD Form 214, dated (050524); Self-Authored Statement; Letter to Congresswoman, dated (101129); Memorandum, Request for Conditional Release, dated (070619);...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024554

    Original file (AR20100024554.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090805 Discharge Received: Date: 091103 Chapter: 13 AR: 635-200 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: Co B, 405th Combat Support Hospital, West Hartford, CT Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 August 2009, the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013926

    Original file (AR20070013926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve when it is determined that a service member is unqualified for further military service by reason of unsatisfactory performance. An enlisted member separated for misconduct which includes unsatisfactory participation will normally be furnished a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions in accordance with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016326

    Original file (AR20110016326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 July 2006, the unit commander declared the applicant an unsatisfactory participant and recommended that he be processed for separation (discharged) from the US Army Reserve under the provisions of AR 135-178. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...