Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011722
Original file (AR20110011722.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/06/02	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that out side of having one period of AWOL from the military he had an outstanding career as a Cavalry Scout and being selected for PSD for a General due to his integrity and personal dedication to the service.  His outstanding performance earned him an Army Commendation Medal.  Since leaving the service he has proved himself to be a functioning member of society and is in the process of joining a Volunteer Fire Department.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090925
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 091102   Chapter: 14-12c (1)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (AWOL)	   RE:     SPD: JKD   Unit/Location: 1st Brigade Combat Team (Rear) (Provisional), 1st Cavalry Division (Rear) (Provisional), Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 (090501-090708) for 69 days.  The applicant returned to his unit.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090804, AWOL (090501-090709), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $300.00 pay for one month, extra duty for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  26
Current ENL Date: 050215    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  21 weeks/The applicant required a moral waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (050208)
Current ENL Service: 	4 Yrs, 6 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Total Service:  		4 Yrs, 6 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 19D10 Cavalry Scout   GT: 104   EDU: 14 Years   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (061021-080102)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ICMDLw/CS, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 22 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (090501-090709), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 22 September 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  On 26 October 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, he issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that out side of having one period of AWOL from the military he had an outstanding career as a Cavalry Scout and being selected for PSD for a General due to his integrity and personal dedication to the service; and his outstanding performance earned him an Army Commendation Medal and since leaving the service he has proved himself to be a functioning member of society and is in the process of joining a Volunteer Fire Department.  The analyst carefully examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review. 
       
       There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offense.  The analyst concluded that the discrediting entry in the applicant's record were not outweighed by prior or subsequent service of sufficient merit to warrant an upgrade of the discharge being reviewed.  Further, analyst the congratulates the applicant on his  work achievements since departing the Army.  However, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 13 January 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 in lieu of a DD Form 293 dated 31 May 2011, Character Reference Letter dated 31 May 2011.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110011722
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021233

    Original file (AR20110021233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he served his country and his Commanding Officer did not like him because he told it like it was. On 21 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011201

    Original file (AR20110011201.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028085

    Original file (AR20100028085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? After a thorough review of the applicant’s records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010462

    Original file (AR20060010462.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 31 July 2007 Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018390

    Original file (AR20090018390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 31 October 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014585

    Original file (AR20090014585.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Company Grade Article 15 and several counseling statements for six specifications of failing to be at his appointed place of duty, leaving his place of duty, two specifications of disobeying a lawful order, and failing to pay...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010407

    Original file (AR20120010407.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080318 Discharge Received: Date: 080402 Chapter: 14-12c (2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: B Company, 2d Brigade Combat Team (Rear)(Provisional), Fort Campbell, KY. Time Lost: The unit commander's memorandum of notification of intent to separate indicates the applicant was AWOL for 31 days (070910-071010). Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: An online DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021761

    Original file (AR20100021761.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 6 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003970

    Original file (AR20110003970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 November 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because his quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012894

    Original file (AR20080012894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 22 November 2006, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...