ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110009691
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he abused illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110009909
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 July 2000, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110009912
On 3 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4". Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110009995
Applicant Name: ????? He has grown a lot since his separation, and he feels as if he should have received an Honorable discharge when he separated. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 August 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct for receiving two Article 15s for FTR and failure to obey a lawful general order; and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010006
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicants discharge. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board voted to adminstratively correct block 27, reentry eligibility (RE) code on the DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010041
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst acknowledges the applicants in-service accomplishments and considered the quality of his service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review which included his combat tour in Afghanistan.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010051
Applicant Name: ????? On 10 February 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010366
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 22 August 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010482
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 September 2005, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010486
The intermediate commander's reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The board recommended separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 13 December 2007, the separation authority approved the boards findings and recommendations and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditionss.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010495
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he disobeyed a lawful order from a SGT x 3 (050523), (050524), (050225), failed to be at his appointed place of duty (050517), made a false official statement to a SGT (050517) and AWOL (050615-050616), with a general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010499
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: On 25 June 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority as having an Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct as well as having Cluster B Personality Traits with Antisocial Features, which were incompatible with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010545
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, the Board of Veterans Appeals stated that competent medical evidence shows that the veteran's seizure disorder did not pre-exist prior to his service and began in service. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, DD Form 214, and documentation from the Board of Veteran's Appeal.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010564
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. Although the applicant did not properly annotate the DD Form 293 requesting a review of his record for a possible upgrade of his discharge; he was given the benefit of this review as instructed in pertinent part (E.3.1.3.2) by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28 which...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010565
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 April 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that she wrongfully used marijuana on two occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010569
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 November 2000, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010583
He never had a pattern of misconduct in his 13 years in the Army. The board recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not recommend the separation authority suspend the applicant's recommended discharge IAW AR 635-200, Chapter 2, Section II. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board directs the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010606
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 March 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request submitted on 17 March 2010 and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010657
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Unsatisfactory Performance", and the separation code is "JHJ."
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010715
Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010732
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended an under other than honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010747
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 16 October 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010753
Applicant Name: ????? On 23 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010793
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010813
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 7 January 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010950
The evidence of record shows that the Commander, Headquarters United States Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, Fort Gordon, GA, forwarded the recommendation that the applicant be separated from the U.S. Army with an general, under honorable conditions discharge. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant was ordered to Active Duty on 26 October 2001 for 3 years which would have given him a term of service end date of 26 October 2004. Certification Signature Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011006
Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Furthermore, the analyst noted on 6 November 2009, the applicant indicated that he underwent a medical examination on or about 18 June 2009, and to the best of his knowledge there had not been any significant change in his medical condition since the accomplishment of that medical examination. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011010
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Official: BONITA E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011013
Applicant Name: ????? On 19 December 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Official: BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011016
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011035
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 020417 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200 Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPD Unit/Location: A Btry, 1-38th FA Bn, APO AP 96257 Time Lost: Confinement for 13 days (011121-011202). Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicants Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011039
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 980302 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Failure to Meet Procurement Medical Fitness Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: Company D, 187th Ordnance Battallion, Training Center, Fort Jackson, SC Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011062
The unit commander recommended separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 5 February 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by numerous incidents of misconduct provides the basis for separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011063
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, based on the available...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011064
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 030226 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 642nd Engineer Company, Fort Drum, NY Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011068
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant state, "i was told at time of discharge that due to the circumstances of my going awol (death of my infant daughter), i would be able to petition for an honorable discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011073
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 3 Mos, 3 Days The computation includes 52 days of excess leave from (020518-020708) Total Service: 1 Yrs, 3 Mos, 3 Days ????? On 17 May 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011201
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011232
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 February 2022, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 14 February 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011234
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, his discharge was improper because he was unable to attend drill. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011235
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 September 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011236
Applicant Name: ????? By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of her service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Official: BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011250
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 June 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Official: BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011257
Applicant Name: ?? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011261
Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the convening authority approved the sentence. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the application he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011268
Applicant Name: ????? This was a tested for drugs in your system for up to a year. However, the applicant's positive urinalysis tests were a result of the commands random urine testing program to maintain good order and discipline within the unit.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011271
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, with a characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011276
On 23 March 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 31 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011310
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions because he never went over the the alloted number of absences with his unit and the fact that he kept the unit informed of his circumstances. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011324
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 June 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for driving under the influence of alcohol, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 June 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...