Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/05/09 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, "I am requesting an upgrade of my military discharge on this date 11 April 2011. It has been almost 9 years since I received my General/Under Honorable Conditions Discharge under the AR 635-200 Paragraph 5-17. I have struggled with alcohol and drug addiction since I joined the United States Army in 2000. Since 9 August 2009 I have been clean and sober. To whom this may concern, may you please take into consideration my request. With an Honorable Discharge, I could further my education and obtain Government work. I am unable to do so now."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 020625
Discharge Received: Date: 020719 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200
Reason: Physical Condition, Not A Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: Charlie Battery, 2d Battalion, 44th Air Defense Artillery, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 020125, disobeyed a lawful order issued by CPT K, not to consume any alcohol over the weekend, by driving while under the influence (020117), violated a lawful general order, use of deadly force, by wrongfully loading a round in the chamber of his weapon (020115), reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $619.00 per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (020726), correctional custody for 30 days, (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 000330 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 3 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 3 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 52D10 Power Equipment Repairer GT: 107 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
On 25 June 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority as having an Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct as well as having Cluster B Personality Traits with Antisocial Features, which were incompatible with military service; additionally, the applicant had difficulty controlling his anger and threatened a Soldier with a loaded weapon while on gate guard and a few days later he was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol; and recommended the applicants discharge with a general, under honorable condition discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 2 July 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 8 July 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records for the period of enlistment under review the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case.
A mental status evaluation by competent medical authority diagnosed the applicant as having an Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct as well as having Cluster B Personality Traits with Antisocial Features, which were incompatible with military service. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition not amounting to a disability, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and informed the applicant as to the specific factors in his service record that would warrant a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst was satisfied that all the requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
The analyst noted the applicant's employment issue; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 16 December 2011 Location: Washington, D. C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: None
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement and a DD Form 214.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Official:
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
?????
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110010499
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | ar20080012811
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states, "I WAS TOLD AT THE TIME OF MY SEPERATION THAT MY UNCHARACTERIZED DISCHARGE WOULD BE CHANGED TO A HONORABLE DISCHARGE AFTER 6 MONTHS OF BEING SEPERATED. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005134
Applicant Name: ????? A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024572
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, documents and the issues submitted, the analyst found no mitigating...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005895
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022237
Facts and Circumstances: On 5 May 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with psychiatric factors which were incompatible with military service and recommended the applicants discharge with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The record indicates the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007165
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014306
Facts and Circumstances: On 3 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood and exercise-induced asthma which were incompatible with military service and recommended the applicants discharge with an honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011069
Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length of his service to include his combat service and as a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008127
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010325
Applicant Name: ????? On 15 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board directs Army Review Boards Agency Case Management Division (CMD) to correct block 27 to reflect Reentry Eligibility Code 3; and issue a new DD...