Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010499
Original file (AR20110010499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/05/09	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I am requesting an upgrade of my military discharge on this date 11 April 2011.  It has been almost 9 years since I received my General/Under Honorable Conditions Discharge under the AR 635-200 Paragraph 5-17.  I have struggled with alcohol and drug addiction since I joined the United States Army in 2000.  Since 9 August 2009 I have been clean and sober.  To whom this may concern, may you please take into consideration my request.  With an Honorable Discharge, I could further my education and obtain Government work.  I am unable to do so now."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 020625
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 020719   Chapter: 5-17    AR: 635-200
Reason: Physical Condition, Not A Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: Charlie Battery, 2d Battalion, 44th Air Defense Artillery, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 020125, disobeyed a lawful order issued by CPT K, not to consume any alcohol over the weekend, by driving while under the influence (020117), violated a lawful general order, use of deadly force, by wrongfully loading a round in the chamber of his weapon (020115), reduction to E-2, forfeiture of $619.00 per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (020726), correctional custody for 30 days, (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 000330    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	 2   Yrs, 3 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Total Service:  		 2   Yrs, 3 Mos, 20 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 52D10 Power Equipment Repairer   GT: 107   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None






VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       On 25 June 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed  by competent medical authority as having an Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct as well as having Cluster B Personality Traits with Antisocial Features, which were incompatible with military service; additionally, the applicant had difficulty controlling his anger and threatened a Soldier with a loaded weapon while on gate guard and a few days later he was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol; and recommended the applicant’s discharge with a general, under honorable condition discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 2 July 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 8 July 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case.  
       
       A mental status evaluation by competent medical authority diagnosed the applicant as having an Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct as well as having Cluster B Personality Traits with Antisocial Features, which were incompatible with military service.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition not amounting to a disability, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and informed the applicant as to the specific factors in his service record that would warrant a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The analyst was satisfied that all the requirements of law and regulations were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
       Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's employment issue; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the board to deny relief. 
       
        

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 December 2011         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement and a DD Form 214.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

Official:




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
?????





Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110010499
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | ar20080012811

    Original file (ar20080012811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states, "I WAS TOLD AT THE TIME OF MY SEPERATION THAT MY UNCHARACTERIZED DISCHARGE WOULD BE CHANGED TO A HONORABLE DISCHARGE AFTER 6 MONTHS OF BEING SEPERATED. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005134

    Original file (AR20080005134.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024572

    Original file (AR20100024572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, documents and the issues submitted, the analyst found no mitigating...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005895

    Original file (AR20120005895.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110022237

    Original file (AR20110022237.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: On 5 May 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with psychiatric factors which were incompatible with military service and recommended the applicant’s discharge with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The record indicates the applicant was...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007165

    Original file (AR20100007165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014306

    Original file (AR20100014306.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: On 3 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood and exercise-induced asthma which were incompatible with military service and recommended the applicant’s discharge with an honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011069

    Original file (AR20070011069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicant’s length of his service to include his combat service and as a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008127

    Original file (AR20080008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010325

    Original file (AR20100010325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 15 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: The Board directs Army Review Boards Agency Case Management Division (CMD) to correct block 27 to reflect Reentry Eligibility Code “3”; and issue a new DD...