Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110011234
Original file (AR20110011234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/05/20	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, his discharge was improper because he was unable to attend drill.  His truck had broken down and he had no money to repair it.  The applicant contends he requested to attend drills closer to his home but his request was denied.  He was unable to find a ride to drill, money for gas, or a place to stay.  He would have liked to continue his military service but he was financially unable to at the time.  Finally, he would like his discharge changed so he can re-enlist and serve his country. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090108   Chapter:  NIF    AR: 135-178
Reason: NIF	   RE:     SPD: NA   Unit/Location: 229 Aviation Regiment, 8th Battalion, Company D, Fort Knox, KY. 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 070816    Current ENL Term: 08 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 07 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 07 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 070816-079827/NA
                                       ADT 070828-080402/HD
                                       (Concurrent Service)  
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 15R10 Y1 AH-64 Attack Helicopter Repairer   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  The record indicates that on 8 January 2008, DA HQS, 11th Aviation Command, Fort Knox, KY,  Orders 09-008-00001, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date; 8 January 2009, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  The record contains a properly constituted Order, which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 135-178, the reason for the applicant’s discharge is not contained in the available record. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The separation policies throughout the different Chapters in this regulation promote the readiness of the Army by providing an orderly means to judge the suitability of persons to serve on the basis of their conduct and their ability to meet required standards of duty performance and discipline.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities.  The characterization is based upon the quality of the Soldier’s service, including the reason for separation and determined in accordance with standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty as found in the UCMJ, Army Regulations, and the time-honored customs and traditions of the Army.  The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.  Possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general, under honorable conditions, under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized, if the Soldier is in entry-level status.  However, the permissible range of characterization varies based on the reason for separation.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issues submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the former Soldier’s discharge from the Army.  However, the record shows that on 8 January 2008, DA HQS, 11th Aviation Command, Fort Knox, KY,  Orders 09-008-00001, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective date; 9 January 2008, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  This document identifies the characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  By the applicant's failure to perform to standards diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue of changing his characterization of service for the purpose of being able to re-enlist.  If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.  
       
       Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army Reserve.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration.  
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 14 December 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and a copy of discharge orders, dated 9 January 2009.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

Official:




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder







Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110011234
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012505

    Original file (AR20090012505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012359

    Original file (AR20090012359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 governs procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army Reserve. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011011

    Original file (AR20090011011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application Receipt Date: 2009/06/22 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge from the United States Army Reserve are not contained in the available records. However, the issue that the applicant submitted is not a matter on which the Army Discharge Review Board grants a change in discharge because it raises no matter of fact, law, procedure, or discretion relating to the discharge process nor is it associated with the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013142

    Original file (AR20060013142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 041013 Chapter: 12 AR: 135-178 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 311th Theater Signal Command USAR Element, Fort Meade, MD 20755 Time Lost: NIF Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. In the absence of corroborated evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003037

    Original file (AR20090003037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2009/01/15 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issues; however, determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080001879

    Original file (AR20080001879.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 040809 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: HQ, 5th Bde, 78th Div, Fort Meade, MD Time Lost: NIF Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012261

    Original file (AR20090012261.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-138, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a general, under conditions discharge. The separation approving authority's documentation directing that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions is not contained in the available...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000367

    Original file (AR20090000367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2008/11/24 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014514

    Original file (AR20100014514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 100308 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Performance RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 396th EN Co, Ashland, KY Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016326

    Original file (AR20110016326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 July 2006, the unit commander declared the applicant an unsatisfactory participant and recommended that he be processed for separation (discharged) from the US Army Reserve under the provisions of AR 135-178. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...