ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023432
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 February 2007, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023435
On 7 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023526
Applicant Name: ????? The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence (i.e., discharge packet) sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. The Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023575
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023582
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 January 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, commission of a serious offense, for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for one violation of wrongfully using cocaine, a controlled substance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023729
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for testing positive for cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue of receiving benefits from the VA; however, determining eligibility...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023873
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 February 2011 , the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant contends there was a pending medical review board and that he should have been medically...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023926
Applicant Name: ????? I had not been eligible to rent a car, so had to fly back, called one of my Drill Sergeants who had give, me two extra days of leave so that I may receive another pay period. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110023960
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 25 November 2011, and a DD Form 214 VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024125
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 7 Mos, 26 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 April 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, for being found guilty by summary court-martial (100226), for wrongfully processing K2 and wrongfully using marijuana, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 5...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024176
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 May 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he was apprehended by the military police for suspicion of driving under the influence of alcohol (110320) and as a result of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor or drugs incapacitated for the proper...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024190
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 October 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongful use of marijuana and failing to go to his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 6 November 2009, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024202
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024214
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and a DD Form 214.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024216
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 October 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, for wrongfully using marijuana (100827 - 100926), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because his quality of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024218
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090831 Discharge Received: Date: 090916 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: Headquarters Company, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Springs, Maryland Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): The applicant's DD Form 214 reflects the applicant was discharged as an E-3; which indicates UCMJ action. Facts and Circumstances: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024225
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for being disrespectful in language and deportment toward a NCO (100507) and testing positive for Oxycodone, a Schedule II controlled substance (100525), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024239
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended: Retention Date: 110721 Discharge Received: Date: 110919 Chapter: 14-12c (2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 July 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he used and possessed a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024244
On 23 April 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. On 5 August 2011, the Army Discharge Review Board upgraded the applicant's characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows that the command attempted to assist the applicant conducting himself to Army standards by providing counseling and by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024245
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 August 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024262
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, the issue [and document] submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024307
He has since completed six months of rehabilitation and has also been pardoned by the civilian authorities. On 18 August 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024326
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions or fully honorable. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-138, by reason of unsatisfactory participation for failing to attend Annual...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024329
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 November 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because his quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024355
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using marijuana (050518) and (050418), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 6 June 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024452
The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 10 June 2005, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024464
Applicant Name: ????? "Pattern of misconduct" for medical issues? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024472
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The only pertinent evidence available for review regarding the applicant's discharge is the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, which was not authenticated by the applicant and other documents that indicate he was AWOL for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024528
On 22 February 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions discharge. This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024529
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12C, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, AWOL on or about (070416-090925). On 18 December 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024594
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and a DD Form 214 VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024691
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 1 February 2010, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. On 24 February 2010, the separation authority approved the separation action and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024725
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024811
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090202 Discharge Received: Date: 090309 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: Rear Detachment Company, 4th Brigade Special Troops Battalion, Fort Carson, Colorado Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090606, incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties as a result of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor or drugs...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024818
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana, absenting himself from his unit (AWOL) (070302-070328); and being drunk on duty, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 June 2007, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024825
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for receiving numerous Article 15s for misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 February 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024832
Applicant Name: ????? On 2 April 2009 , the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Before initiating action to separate the applicant, the command ensured the applicant was appropriately counseled about the deficiencies, which could lead to separation.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024835
Applicant Name: ????? The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024838
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 February 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024839
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. In fact, the only pertinent evidence available for review regarding the applicant's discharge is the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, which was authenticated by the applicant.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024847
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 110721 Discharge Received: Date: 110913 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial By Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: HHC, 3 BCT, 25 ID, Schofield Barracks, HI Time Lost: AWOL x 1 for a total of 111 days (110321 - 110712), apprehended. On 17 August 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025014
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized discharge. Army regulations stipulate that the service of any individual who has more than 180 days of continuous active duty at the time of their notification of an impending...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025019
The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application, Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) Proceedings, Report of Medical...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025022
Applicant Name: ????? The Board will consider any aggravating factors and in their absence, will change the narrative reason for the discharge to Secretarial Authority. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Provision of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of JFF and a reentry code (RE) of 1."
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025143
Applicant Name: ????? The applicants statements alone do not overcome the presumption of government regularity in this case and the application contains no documentation or further evidence in support of this request for an upgrade of the discharge. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025154
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he requests an upgrade to his discharge to honorable and change the RE code to allow him to reenter the military. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct (Drug Abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025156
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, through legal counsel that in light of the changes in military policy regarding homosexual speech and conduct that have occurred since the applicant's discharge, the Board should: change the applicant's narrative reason for discharge from Homosexual Conduct (Admission) to Secretarial Authority and change his reentry code from RE-4 to RE- 1J. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025222
Therefore, except for the foregoing modification to the applicant's reentry eligibility (RE) code, the Board determined that the characterization of service and the reason for discharge were both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: Correct block 27, reentry eligibility (RE) code to "3." Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025243
Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Pattern of Misconduct," and the separation code is "JKA." Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110025246
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is requesting an upgrade of his discharge to general under honorable conditions or to fully honorable because he was unjustly and unfairly separated from the Army and that his reentry code is changed to 1. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of...